Orly Taitz Refuses to Pay Judge’s $20,000 Sanction

WRBL 3 ^

[mnehring]

Orly Taitz is refusing to pay a $20,000 sanction issued by Judge Clay Land, who is also presiding over the Mark Shelnutt trial.

Taitz is the California attorney who filed a motion for Capt. Connie Rhodes. Rhodes attempted to halt her Iraq deployment on the grounds that President Obama’s holding office was not legitimate.

Taitz told News 3 that she believes the sanctions were asserted in an attempt to silence her challenge of Obama’s legitimacy.

“I really haven’t done anything that would justify the sanction. If anything it is the opposite. The sanction was not justified. It was a political move. It is an extremely dangerous precedent to set.“

Taitz has retained counsel for her appeal.

[mnehring]

Correction on previous, he asked the money to go the National Infantry Foundation at Fort Benning.

[Macoozie]

Free the BC! Free the BC! Free the BC!

No proof of his birth has ever been offered, at any time, by anyone . . . ever. All who claim it has been produced are duplicitous in this treasonous scam. Just produce the document from Hawaii. That’s all. Don’t obfuscate by shouting about the one on the web.

Produce the real deal, for public examination.

[mlo]

"Millions of dollars being spent on legal fees to prevent simple public documents from being examined."

If you get sued, you have to reply. That normally means hiring a lawyer. That's all he's done. Obama has not initiated any suits.

[wintertime]

If you get sued, you have to reply. That normally means hiring a lawyer. That's all he's done. Obama has not initiated any suits.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

And...All of these suits would have been stopped in their tracks with the nod of Obama’s head to his secretary and ( at most) $50 worth of documents.

Only a **NUT** or criminal would expend more than a million of his own, others, and/or taxpayer dollars to prevent the release of these documents. Obama has also **deliberately** diverted DOJ attorneys from important matters such as keeping our soldiers from being murdered by a terrorist on their own soil!

Fundamentally,....An honest man would be **HONORED** to prove in every way possible that they were a natural born citizen and **constitutionally** eligible to be a Commander in Chief of our troops and president of the people.

So?...What does Obama’s actions say about his character? What does it say about the character of those who defend his actions?

[wintertime]

I have read on these threads that the hard part is that every other real birth certificate is numbered. It is one thing to fake one birth certificate. It another to re-do and fake **all** the birth certificates for all the children born for a year or more.

[bvw]

I agree with Orly. The sanctions are thuggery.

[wintertime]

All who claim it has been produced are duplicitous in this treasonous scam.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What does this say about Obama’s character?

What does it say about those who defend his actions?

[mlo]

"And...All of these suits would have been stopped in their tracks with the nod of Obama’s head to his secretary and ( at most) $50 worth of documents."

That's simply not true. Not one of the suits ever got to an evidentiary phase, where such documentation would be produced. There was no point at which Obama's lawyers could have walked in with such documentation and made them go away. It's not even true that such documentation would settle the issues contained on the suits. They contained other claims.

[Lurking Libertarian]

I agree with Orly. The sanctions are thuggery.

You think it is proper conduct for an attorney to file papers in court accusing the judge of an unethical meeting with the Attorney General, which supposedly took place at a time when the Attornewy General was in California and the judge was in Georgia?

[bvw]

I think Justice is Justice. Not “proper conduct” — to me to pass “proper conduct” as Justice ... well, a con.

Are you a con man? Seems like we have them aplenty in our times.

[Lurking Libertarian]

I think Justice is Justice. Not “proper conduct” — to me to pass “proper conduct” as Justice ... well, a con.

Whay is unjust about punishing a lawyer for improper and illegal conduct?

[American Constitutionalist]

" Not a dime has come out of his pocket so what does Obama care? "
Your right, what does he care, it's not his money, it's the people's money.

[bvw]

Have you read the accounts of the trial of William Penn — it was that trial that established our views of trial by Jury.

Was William Penn proper?

[vikk]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22664105/Rivernider-22-Plaintiffs-Response-to-3rd-Order-to-Show-Cause-11-16-2009

Well, now Charles Lincoln III has put his business out in the street. This is getting tawdry and disturbing.

There’s some interesting info on the mortgage reclaimation biz they were running as well...going through that now.

[GI Joe Fan]

And...All of these suits would have been stopped in their tracks with the nod of Obama’s head to his secretary and ( at most) $50 worth of documents.

Only a **NUT** or criminal would expend more than a million of his own, others, and/or taxpayer dollars to prevent the release of these documents. Obama has also **deliberately** diverted DOJ attorneys from important matters such as keeping our soldiers from being murdered by a terrorist on their own soil!

Fundamentally,....An honest man would be **HONORED** to prove in every way possible that they were a natural born citizen and **constitutionally** eligible to be a Commander in Chief of our troops and president of the people.

So?...What does Obama’s actions say about his character? What does it say about the character of those who defend his actions?

[wintertime]

Only a **NUT** or criminal would expend more than a million of his own, others, and/or taxpayer dollars to prevent the release of these documents. Obama has also **deliberately** diverted DOJ attorneys from important matters such as keeping our soldiers from being murdered by a terrorist on their own soil!

Fundamentally,....An honest man would be **HONORED** to **PROMPTLY** prove in every way possible that they were a natural born citizen and **constitutionally** eligible to be a Commander in Chief of our troops and president of the people.

So?...What does Obama’s actions say about his character? What does it say about the character of those who defend his actions?

[GI Joe Fan]

Why are simple questions met with an army of lawyers?

Raila Odinga's favorite cousin is a pathological liar and narcissist, and these court cases and the millions of dollars that have been wasted on them show me that he is hiding a lot of information for A VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

I am going to answer my own question right now, and dare you or anyone to tell me why this answer is wrong:

Odinga's favorite cousin knows that he is NOT Constitutionally valid as President.

That's why he is throwing lawyer after lawyer at anyone who asks simple questions regarding his birth data.

[GI Joe Fan]

Why are simple questions met with an army of lawyers? Raila Odinga's favorite cousin is a pathological liar and narcissist, and these court cases and the millions of dollars that have been wasted on them show me that he is hiding a lot of information for A VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

I am going to answer my own question right now, and dare you or anyone to tell me why this answer is wrong:

Odinga's favorite cousin knows that he is NOT Constitutionally valid as President.

That's why he is throwing lawyer after lawyer after lawyer at anyone who asks simple questions regarding his birth data.

[GI Joe Fan]

MLO, I apologize for directing this post at you. It was meant for Non-Sequitur.

Non-Sequitur,

Why are simple questions met with an army of lawyers? Raila Odinga's favorite cousin is a pathological liar and narcissist, and these court cases and the millions of dollars that have been wasted on them show me that he is hiding a lot of information for A VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

I am going to answer my own question right now, and dare you or anyone to tell me why this answer is wrong:

Odinga's favorite cousin knows that he is NOT Constitutionally valid as President.

That's why he is throwing lawyer after lawyer at anyone who asks simple questions regarding his birth data.

Suppose I applied for an office job at Chevron, and the management asked that I provide them with certain information. If I refuse to give them any information and instead sent a lawyer after them for this request, would that be an appropriate response?

[Non-Sequitur]

Odinga's favorite cousin knows that he is NOT Constitutionally valid as President.

Then prove it.