Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Holder, much wrestling over decision
Washington Post ^ | November 14, 2009 | Carrie Johnson

Posted on 11/14/2009 6:40:21 AM PST by opentalk

Eric H. Holder Jr. called his order Friday to send the suspected plotters of the Sept. 11 attacks to trial in Manhattan "the toughest decision I've had to make as attorney general." But what the nation's chief law enforcement officer did not lay bare for public consumption was the four months of deliberation, lobbying and tug of war inside his own Justice Department that preceded an announcement that will follow him into history.

In his nine months in office, Holder has jettisoned a public corruption case against former senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) because of prosecutorial lapses, launched an inquiry into CIA interrogators who abused terrorism suspects and announced a turnaround on medical-marijuana enforcement. Each decision has drawn a measure of criticism from Capitol Hill and some of his predecessors.

Nevertheless, the fate of the five men who allegedly conspired to use fully fueled airliners as weapons of mass destruction in 2001 posed the single biggest legal and political question that Holder is likely to face. The criminal proceedings against Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his four alleged confederates may display to the world all the protections and failings of the U.S. justice system.

"The stakes are high," Holder said Friday in a brief conversation. "You have what is truly the trial of the century. The American people are committed to the resolution of this, and I considered that closely in picking the right place, the right forum, the right team."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; democrats; ericthejackboot; holder; islamism; liberalfascism; obama; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2009 6:40:23 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Meanwhile his old law firm will be defending the slugs.


2 posted on 11/14/2009 6:42:28 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Does anybody with a brain believe this Obamanation was a Holder decision?
3 posted on 11/14/2009 6:43:06 AM PST by hflynn (The One is really the Number Two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Does anybody with a brain believe this Obamanation was a Holder decision?
4 posted on 11/14/2009 6:43:17 AM PST by hflynn (The One is really the Number Two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Who did he wrestle with? It wasn’t his conscience, ‘cause he doesn’t have one.


5 posted on 11/14/2009 6:43:26 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

“Wrestling.” Or a “risky decision,” the media say. If Bush or McCain had done something so stupid or reckless in endangering lives the headlines would be screaming about incompetence, America being made more vulnerable, etc.


6 posted on 11/14/2009 6:43:53 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Total BS, this has been his goal since 2001. Put Bush on trial. This will be a show trial of the Bush years and the war on terror todate


7 posted on 11/14/2009 6:45:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

This article is devoid of truth. The Lib Holder, worst AG of all time, reflexively takes the ACLU position every time. Consequences to the country be damned.


8 posted on 11/14/2009 6:46:36 AM PST by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Anybody who believes this WaPost fabrication also still puts their teeth under the pillow and leaves cookies for Santa Claus.


9 posted on 11/14/2009 6:47:48 AM PST by hampdenkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Such a tough decision. We’re supposed to be in awe that their superior intellects had to work so hard to make these decisions. Why if people that superior to us had a hard time with the issue, we should just follow them. It’s clearly beyond us.

To which I say: NUTS!


10 posted on 11/14/2009 6:48:14 AM PST by piytar (Go Away RNC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“allegedly conspired”

ALLEGEDLY??????

This is exactly what I was afraid of.


11 posted on 11/14/2009 6:48:22 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

He had to wrestle between the plusses—putting the Bush administration on trial for “torture” and giving the jihadists a platform for international publicity, vs. the negative of public outrage if the defendants were to get off. Maybe he’s sure the fix is in so the defendants can’t walk free.


12 posted on 11/14/2009 6:48:51 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk; All

Carl Rove was on Fox and Friends a few minutes ago and said something that I hadn’t even thought of and that is the safety of the jurors. And it is very likely that will become a major concern. Anyone who believes that there aren’t Jihadis in this country who will try to destroy the jury is a fool, not to even mention the rest of the population.


13 posted on 11/14/2009 6:50:19 AM PST by davisfh ( Islam is a very serious mental and social illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hflynn

Under a bus or bust!!


14 posted on 11/14/2009 6:51:53 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
A jury of their "peers" would be 100% Muslim.

Not guilty.

15 posted on 11/14/2009 6:52:05 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I’ve got a serious question for Freepers. We’ve had fictional depictions of treasonous politicians before (i.e. Manchurian Candidate) but my question is this:

Excluding puppet governments that have been installed by conquering powers (like what the Japanese did in Manchuria) has there ever been a treasonous administration in history like the one we have that has rose up from within?


16 posted on 11/14/2009 6:52:16 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
They are going to try use this as a show trial to gather public support and evidence that Bush and Cheney should be indicted for illegal acts against humanity, i.e., water boarding etc.
A 30 minute clip of the people jumping to their deaths at the WTC 9/11/01 and the collapsing of the buildings should remind the people of what happened. I choose FOX to do this AFTER the jury is impaneled and sequestered.
17 posted on 11/14/2009 6:53:48 AM PST by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

There was no wrestling with this decision, except for when to release the decision. The decision was made on Obama’s first day in office when he decided to close Gitmo.


18 posted on 11/14/2009 6:53:57 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Barbra Streisand!!


19 posted on 11/14/2009 6:54:18 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

I mean even Neville Chamberlain wasn’t trying (I don’t think) to destroy Britain - he was duped by Hitler - I don’t think he was working towards Britain’s destruction.


20 posted on 11/14/2009 6:54:26 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson