Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Warns of Threats to Freedom, Economic Growth
Washington Times ^ | 11-13-09 | Joseph Curl

Posted on 11/13/2009 7:19:25 AM PST by thouworm

Former President George W. Bush, outlining plans for a new public policy institute, on Thursday said America must fight the temptation to allow the federal government to take control of the private sector, declaring that too much government intervention will squelch economic recovery and expansion.

(snip)

In his speech, which set out his goals for a new policy institute focused on economic growth, education, human freedom and global health, Mr. Bush said he entered politics because "because I saw society drifting away from the values at the heart of the American Dream."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anotherfrbdsthread; bds; bdsisaliveandwell; bdslives; bdsreignsupreme; bush; economy; georgewbush; gwbush; presidentbush; presidentgeorgewbush; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: thouworm
Not only was and is Presidente Jorge a promoter of amnesty, he allowed the GOP to become a mucho grande pinata from which it has yet to recover.

Muchas gracias, amigo.

Leni

101 posted on 11/13/2009 7:50:53 PM PST by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

A Bush will always release some steam when he is out of power. But “in power”, he spends all his time trying to get a Democrat to say something nice about him. And they NEVER DO!


102 posted on 11/13/2009 7:59:19 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

The simple reason that we “bash” GWB (actually it’s telling the truth) is that he is mostly responsible for the horrors of 2008 and 2009. He set the machinery in motion.


103 posted on 11/13/2009 8:01:11 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

saying that tells me you have not the slight understanding of who Obama. I’m not here to defend Bush.


104 posted on 11/13/2009 8:08:12 PM PST by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS; thouworm
Posting a thread is somehow a subject for criticism also?

Absolutely. FR isn't a Bush fan club site...

No, FR isn't a Bush fan club site, nor is it supposed to be a republican site or a TADSLOS Approved only site.

What it is:
We are a political discussion forum and independent grassroots conservative activist group supported by donations from our readers and participants.

Given your logic why are articles posted about obama, pelousy, reid??? We are a "political discussion forum" not some arm of pravda. President Bush was in the news, thus the article. If you don't like it, take it up with Jim!

105 posted on 11/13/2009 8:10:05 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mendedheart
As time goes by- Bush is going to look mighty good as Obama push his socialist agenda threw the country

TARP, bailouts, amnesty.

I assume you oppose all of these, because Obama supports all of these.

But, GWB supported all of these also.

106 posted on 11/13/2009 8:10:08 PM PST by kevao (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS; thouworm
You are the one who started casting aspersions of other Freepers posts to your thread because we don’t agree with your stance.

Really? Where exactly did thouworm do that. I just read all his/her posts and found nothing that would qualify as "casting aspersions" in any post by him/her.

107 posted on 11/13/2009 8:14:08 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody; TADSLOS; thouworm
Given your logic why are articles posted about obama, pelousy, reid??? We are a "political discussion forum" not some arm of pravda. President Bush was in the news, thus the article. If you don't like it, take it up with Jim!

1) thouworm posts an article about Bush.

2) Some people post replies critical of Bush.

3) thouworm says posting about Bush is "fighting the last war."

Where's the logic in that?

108 posted on 11/13/2009 8:16:30 PM PST by kevao (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
I really don’t give a damn what Bush has to say on the subject.

Clearly you do or you would not have clicked on this thread.

109 posted on 11/13/2009 8:17:56 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Frankly, I could give a damn what Bush has to say now.

Again...you must give a d@(# because you are here. You still have free will, until obama takes that away, and you CHOSE to click on this article while proclaiming you don't care what he has to say.

110 posted on 11/13/2009 8:22:08 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: kevao
TARP, bailouts...Wake up!

Exactly! Repeating your own words back to you; TARP, bailouts...Wake up!

If you do not understand them now, you are being willfully ignorant. Read the posts on this thread. TARP is discussed. Read...Learn...educate yourself.

111 posted on 11/13/2009 8:26:50 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
If you do not understand them now, you are being willfully ignorant. Read the posts on this thread. TARP is discussed. Read...Learn...educate yourself.

I understand that Bush gave us the TARP and bailouts.

And I understand that you oppose the TARP and bailouts.

And yet you take offense when someone criticizes Bush for the TARP and bailouts.

112 posted on 11/13/2009 8:38:30 PM PST by kevao (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: kevao
And I understand that you oppose the TARP and bailouts.

Ummmmm, no I don't. What gave you that idea? What is the difference between TARP and the bailouts?

113 posted on 11/13/2009 9:17:22 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
Ummmmm, no I don't. What gave you that idea?

Well, you got me there. I assumed you would oppose TARP, as we are on a conservative forum. But apparently you don't.

(You and Obama do agree on at least one thing. LOL!)

What is the difference between TARP and the bailouts?

TARP = Toxic Asset Relief Program. Approved by Congress for banking sector.

BAILOUT = Using TARP (!) money for loans to ailing *auto* companies.

114 posted on 11/13/2009 9:43:19 PM PST by kevao (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: altura

“I really don’t appreciate your coming on this thread and insulting the last good president.”

He insulted Reagan? Where?


115 posted on 11/14/2009 8:24:53 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kevao
I assumed you would oppose TARP, as we are on a conservative forum.

The complete and utter collapse of the U.S. economy, and thus the collapse of the world economy, should not be a conservative vs. liberal or republican vs. demonrat issue. It should be an issue of supporting our country and our way of life or working to hasten it's destruction.

Did you bother to read post #23?
HIGHLIGHTS: “a tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the United States, to the tune of $550 billion, was drawn out in the matter of an hour or two.” “their estimation was that by 2 o'clock that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the United States, would have collapsed the entire economy system of the United States and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed.”

It is simply amazing that so many "conservatives" fail to see what nearly happened last year, or choose to be ignorant of the facts.

Thank you for the definitions I requested. They are exactly the same as mine, but you never know around here any more and I wanted to make sure we were talking about the same thing.

Make no mistake...I agree with the usurper on NOTHING! We don't even agree on what his name is, legally.

116 posted on 11/14/2009 8:55:24 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

“It is simply amazing that so many “conservatives” fail to see what nearly happened last year, or choose to be ignorant of the facts.”

You mean the sudden collapse of the credit bubble? We’ve (conservatives) have been predicting that for some time.

Intervention like TARP will, if economic history is a guide, prolong and worsen the problem.


117 posted on 11/15/2009 7:45:21 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
You mean the sudden collapse of the credit bubble? We’ve (conservatives) have been predicting that for some time.

No, that is not what I meant. There is far more to it than the credit bubble which has been discussed ad nauseum. For those with an agenda, the truth about what happened remains invisible to them. I'm sick to death of all the obfuscation.

118 posted on 11/15/2009 7:58:40 AM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

“No, that is not what I meant. There is far more to it than the credit bubble which has been discussed ad nauseum. For those with an agenda, the truth about what happened remains invisible to them. I’m sick to death of all the obfuscation.”

So, forcing banks to take government ownership and setting up a slush fund that hasn’t been completely spent even NOW, while setting the stage for a massive government takeover of all aspects of the economy saved us all?

A credit collapse was predicted in 2008 and, yes, it happened. What money movement are you talking about? WaMu?

I believe the current skunks like the phrase “never let a good crisis go to waste”. Well, they aren’t.


119 posted on 11/15/2009 8:09:42 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“W did his part for the economy by retiring. Too bad he was replaced by someone just as bad.”

As socialist-leaning as W was, he still wasn’t as far left as the current guy. Of course, it’s only a matter of scale, but still.


120 posted on 11/15/2009 8:14:18 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson