Replies

>>There is no science behind all species evolving from one, only philosophy.<<

This is like trying to explain Relational Theory to someone with no knowledge of set theory, much less information theory, much less an IT background.

Your extremely lay (and rather cute) position based on 100% ignorance of science is the same as placing a Dunce cap on your own head and then saying “only us Dunces know stuff.”

I will ask you a question about yet another area of science I am sure you are ignorant on and spot you Google and Yahoo: what is the difference between a query and an inquiry (show your work - that is which relational theory rules are in play and how). I mean, if you can pontificate and draw scientific conclusions on the natural sciences, then information and relational theory should be a walk in the park.

While you are at it, you can educate everyone on what a Scientific Theory is and how the Theory of Gravity plays into your cute little lay understanding.

Answer these and the world is your oyster.

Unsportsmanlike; attacking faith is a sport for small boys.

Darwin’s mistake was thinking that his theory would advance understanding of nature while ignoring the obvious fact that civilization would champion the weak, therby undermining his theory’s very foundation.

It still remains open for discussion as to whether evolution should be thought progressive or comsumptive.

"This is like trying to explain Relational Theory to someone with no knowledge of set theory, much less information theory, much less an IT background. Your extremely lay (and rather cute) position based on 100% ignorance of science is the same as placing a Dunce cap on your own head and then saying “only us Dunces know stuff.”

To say your hostile would be quite the understatement. If I'm so dumb, then why don't you go find scientific studies where new species have been created from existing species. I can't wait to see them! Do use Google and Yahoo, I'm sure they will help.

"I will ask you a question about yet another area of science I am sure you are ignorant on and spot you Google and Yahoo: what is the difference between a query and an inquiry (show your work - that is which relational theory rules are in play and how). I mean, if you can pontificate and draw scientific conclusions on the natural sciences, then information and relational theory should be a walk in the park."

This whole block of text is exhibit A for evidence on proving your arrogance and complete lack of understanding the most basic concepts of an argument. The only thing you understand is childish insults.

"While you are at it, you can educate everyone on what a Scientific Theory is and how the Theory of Gravity plays into your cute little lay understanding."

Since you believe the magic of the origin of all species from one is scientifically sound, then I'm 100% certain you know nothing about Scientific Theory. Why should I explain it, me explaining Scientific Theory has nothing to do with this topic at all. Then again, do you ever post anything about what the topic of the original post actually was?