Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia’s Governor-Elect Says No to Gov’t-Run Health Care Option
CNS News ^ | November 10, 2009 | Matt Cover

Posted on 11/10/2009 2:21:24 PM PST by IbJensen

CNSNews.com) – Virginia’s Governor-elect Bob McDonnell (R) said that his administration would not participate in a government-run health insurance plan, if one is passed by Congress and signed into law. He also urged other governors to “stand up” against federal proposals if they are not good for their states.

McDonnell, who won election on Nov. 3 with 59 percent of the vote, said on the Nov. 8 edition of CNN’s “State of the Union” that a government-run public option would be bad for his recently red state. McDonnell also said that during the campaign he heard concerns from Virginia voters about the negative consequences of the congressional Democrats’ health care overhauls.

“My concern is just from hearing from Virginians over the last couple of months, is the increase in cost, less choices, perhaps longer waiting lines, and more government control,” McDonnell said on CNN.

“Families and businesses in Virginia told me they’re very concerned about those [issues], taking money from Medicare, maybe $400 billion,” he said.

McDonnell further noted that while he had not read the 2,000-plus-page bill, the public option was not something that would “help us in Virginia.”

“So I need to digest what happened last night,” McDonnell said in reference to Saturday’s near-midnight passage of the House health care bill. “But the public option does not seem to be something that is going to help us in Virginia.”

Two different options

The public option, as enshrined in the House-passed bill, would be a government health insurance agency run by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and available through the federal Health Insurance Exchange.

As the bill states (HR 3962): “There is established within the Health Choices Administration and under the direction of the Commissioner a Health Insurance Exchange in order to facilitate access of individuals and employers, through a transparent process, to a variety of choices of affordable, quality health insurance coverage, including a public health insurance option.”

However, states can run their own exchanges provided they get permission from the federal government – permission which will only be granted to states whose exchanges mirror the federal exchange.

Again, the bill reads: “If—(1) a State (or group of States, subject to the approval of the Commissioner) applies to the Commissioner for approval of a State-based Health Insurance Exchange to operate in the State (or group of States); and (2) the Commissioner approves such State-based Health Insurance Exchange then, subject to subsections (c) and (d), the State-based Health Insurance Exchange shall operate, instead of the Health Insurance Exchange, with respect to such State (or group of States).”

If a state does not meet federal requirements, which will be determined by the HHS secretary (currently Kathleen Sebelius), it cannot operate its own exchange.

The most recent Senate version of health care reform, written by the Finance Committee, says that each state is required to create two separate exchanges, one for individuals and large businesses and one for small businesses, with the option to combine the two.

That bill reads: “(1) an exchange for the State that is designed to facilitate the enrollment of qualified individuals in qualified health benefits plans offered in the individual market in the State;

“and (2) a Small Business Health Options Program (in this title referred to as a ‘SHOP exchange’) that is designed to assist qualified small employers in facilitating the enrollment of their employees in qualified health benefits plans offered in either the individual or the small group market in the State.”

The Senate plan includes an exit strategy of sorts – a waiver to “all or any” of the bill’s requirements – for states that already have health insurance plans in place or that simply want to avoid the myriad of mandates imposed by the legislation.

“A State may apply to the Secretary for the waiver of all or any requirements under this title,” the bill stated, “with respect to health insurance coverage within that State for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.”

The secretary will approve the waiver and its terms, if the state can show that it provides at least as much coverage to its citizens as they would get from the government reforms. If not, then the HHS secretary would notify the state and send the matter to Congress.

“If the Secretary determines a waiver should not be granted under this section, the Secretary shall notify the State involved, and the appropriate committees of Congress of such determination and the reasons therefore,” the proposed law states.

The Senate Finance Committee plan does not contain a government-run public option, although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has pledged to include one in his final floor version. Reid’s public option would include an opt-out provision for states, which would not have to offer it in the exchanges they set up.

“The best way to move forward is with a public option with an opt-out provision for states,” Reid said at an Oct. 27 press conference. “Under this concept states will be able to determine whether the public option works best for them and will have the ability to opt out if they so choose.”

Standing up for states

McDonnell said that regardless of which proposal comes out on top, Virginia will not be participating, adding that he preferred to handle things himself rather than accept Washington’s dictates.

“Well, either way, my preference would be not to have Virginia participate,” McDonnell told CNN. “We’ve outlined a number of things I think we can do at our state level, John [King, host of “State of the Union”], that will help our people have more access at lower cost, but I’m very concerned about turning this significant section of the American economy over to the federal government.”

McDonnell said that other state governors needed to “stand up” to Washington when federal policies are bad for individual states.

“I believe that a governor should stand up to Washington,” he said. “If they do things that are bad for Virginia, that are going to kill jobs or raise taxes or create new bureaucracy or hurt small business, I will be a governor that will stand up and say, that’s not good for Virginia.”

McDonnell added that he and his fellow governors, both Republicans and Democrats, knew their states best and were well-positioned to make decisions on which health reforms work – not Washington bureaucrats.

“I believe in our federal system,” he said, “that the governors, Republican and Democrat around the country, [are] closer to the people [and] can make some of these decisions better.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; communistdemocrats; federalism; hr3962; mcdonnell; publicoption; va2009
... states can run their own exchanges provided they get permission from the federal government – permission which will only be granted to states whose exchanges mirror the federal exchange.

They rammed it through Congress, now they'll ram it down our throats.

Hidden in this monstrosity of a 'bill' is the $750 per employee, Employee Tax. There are so many hidden gimmicks in this nation destructing monster that if the Senate passes this....we're sunk!

1 posted on 11/10/2009 2:21:25 PM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“A State may apply to the Secretary for the waiver of all or any requirements under this title,” the bill stated, “with respect to health insurance coverage within that State for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.”

The new Republican President will have dismantled it by then anyway...she would never tolerate this...


2 posted on 11/10/2009 2:25:09 PM PST by jessduntno (TOTUS fails and POtuS becomes a phuttering stuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
There was a great segment by "The Judge" on Glenn Beck on how states can obstruct the massive intrusive Gubmint and usurpation of powers not granted under the Constitution and that is thru "Nullification," and simply refuse to adhere to the law(s) Congress passes, much as was accomplished with the National ID program when a dozen or so states balked at implementation.

There were suggestions that if a handful of states decided to simply refuse to adhere to O'Bozzo's & Congress's Death Care this could effectively kill it.

Here's hoping there are enough state Legislators & Governors willing to undertake this process.

3 posted on 11/10/2009 3:10:28 PM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Hoorah for my future adopted home state! I can’t wait to retire and move to Virginia. SOMEBODY has to enforce the 10th amendments. The sovereign states need to start telling the US central government, “If you can’t cite your powers in the US Constitution, drop dead.”

HOOOOOOOOOOOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH for Virginia!


4 posted on 11/10/2009 3:12:27 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 50... 49... 48...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
a state does not meet federal requirements, which will be determined by the HHS secretary (currently Kathleen Sebelius), it cannot operate its own exchange.

Virginia just needs to tell Sebelius to screw off.

5 posted on 11/10/2009 3:42:40 PM PST by MrDem (And this is a loyal lifelong Democrat saying this... Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"They rammed it through Congress, now they'll ram it down our throats."

It's time for a few states to RAM This Law down the feds throats.

6 posted on 11/10/2009 3:45:46 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Here’s bumping good news! Thanks for the post.

http://www.bobmcdonnell.com/


7 posted on 11/10/2009 5:08:46 PM PST by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I thought only Nevada could choose to be exempt.


8 posted on 11/10/2009 5:10:15 PM PST by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

God bless Governor-elect McDonnell.


9 posted on 11/10/2009 5:14:48 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
They rammed it through Congress, now they'll ram it down our throats.

Just like they have rammed everything else down our throats over the years. They know we will bitch, whine, moan, groan and complain for a while. But in the end, we will do as we have always done; take it like the good little sheeple we have always been.

This is the reality to date. Congress passes laws and we comply. And for those who do not accept the law, there are always plenty of folks around to remind them if they don't like the law, then work to change it.

10 posted on 11/10/2009 5:30:56 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Freedom Watch: fight for freedom with everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson