They haven't figured out a way to spin this one yet so will likely be buried as usual.
1 posted on
11/10/2009 11:00:01 AM PST by
Teflonic
To: Teflonic
Everything Al Gore believes about carbon is wrong.
2 posted on
11/10/2009 11:02:47 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: Teflonic; markomalley; scripter; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
3 posted on
11/10/2009 11:04:40 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: Teflonic
it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models. Data? Data? We don't need no steenkin' DATA!
![](http://blogs.sun.com/factotum/resource/badges.jpg)
4 posted on
11/10/2009 11:05:27 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Teflonic
This, among other contradicting reports, will be buried.
5 posted on
11/10/2009 11:06:54 AM PST by
cranked
To: Teflonic
“terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans have a much greater capacity to absorb CO2”
ya mean, increased CO2 leads to increased plant growth that absorbs the increased CO2?
Because increased plant life is necessary to support whoever and whatever is giving off the excess CO2?
As if the earth were a living ecosystem that had some mysterious ability to self-correct and balance itself to support life?
Nah, never ......
6 posted on
11/10/2009 11:07:25 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
To: Teflonic
8 posted on
11/10/2009 11:15:26 AM PST by
NMEwithin
To: Teflonic
the alarmists rely completely on models and models don't have the capability of factoring in data brought out in the article.
9 posted on
11/10/2009 11:15:46 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: Teflonic
the alarmists rely completely on models and models don't have the capability of factoring in data brought out in the article.
10 posted on
11/10/2009 11:16:06 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: Teflonic
One of the first rules that every scientist is supposed to learn is that when the model contradicts the data, the model is wrong.
19 posted on
11/10/2009 11:47:06 AM PST by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
To: Teflonic
The whole Al Gore/Jim Hansen/Green CAGW thing is falling apart. This new finding supports the notion that CO2 is not nearly as long-lived as had been assumed and baked into the climate models. More and more people are asking the basic questions that should have been asked back in 1988 when Hansen began his chicken little routine.
There is a new discussion report on Himalayan Glaciers from the Indian Ministry for the Environment that basically aargues that the scaremongering about the disappearance of these glaciers is just that and that there is no significant change in the rate of retreat of these glaciers since the last Ice Age - averaging 5 meters per year or about 500 yards per century!
The new Finish TV special that points out the flawed science underpinning the iconic hockey stick is excellent. Transcripts are available at http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/09/mcintyre-and-lindzen-to-appear-on-finnish-tv-documentary-transcript/
20 posted on
11/10/2009 11:50:26 AM PST by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: Teflonic
So is this good news for climate negotiations in Copenhagen? Of course not. The Copenhagen negotiations have nothing to do with climate, or science at all; it's a global wealth restructuring conference.
21 posted on
11/10/2009 11:51:39 AM PST by
denydenydeny
(The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein sees the local cemetery; raw material for experiment)
To: Teflonic
The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysical Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models. HERESY! BLASPHEMY! If it's not derived from a computer model, it can't be science. /s
22 posted on
11/10/2009 11:55:56 AM PST by
denydenydeny
(The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein sees the local cemetery; raw material for experiment)
To: Teflonic
23 posted on
11/10/2009 12:10:34 PM PST by
freeforall
(Answers are a burden for oneself, questions are a burden for others.)
To: Teflonic
"..The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysical Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and
does not rely on computations with complex climate models..."
IOW the conclusions are based on real world data instead of the assumptions of computer models. These models are tricked up to reach any desired conclusion the modeler wants. Invariably those conclusions are anti- industry and anti-capitalism.
To: Teflonic
Sure. What the public doesn’t know won’t make them uppity.
25 posted on
11/10/2009 1:14:55 PM PST by
Eleutheria5
(www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html, http://sites.google.com/site/thevuzvuz/)
To: Teflonic
To the sticking place ... FACEBOOK AWAY!
28 posted on
11/10/2009 2:06:48 PM PST by
Jo Nuvark
(Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson