Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

Yes. Did you read the article linked to at your link.
“Previous examples of soft tissues fossilised in this way have been limited to samples extracted from amber or inside bone .
“fossilized”


19 posted on 11/09/2009 10:15:36 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
This thread is deteriorating, but the idea of Jurrasic Salamander is kinda interesting.
22 posted on 11/09/2009 10:19:11 AM PST by colorado tanker (What's it all about, Barrrrry? Is it just for the power, you live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I know the terminology they use can be confusing, but make no mistake, they are finding dino soft tissue, to enclude proteins, connective tissue, blood vessels and even blood cells:

Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation!

Mary Schweitzer announces even stronger evidence, this time from a duckbilled dino fossil, of even more proteins—and the same amazingly preserved vessel and cell structures as before.

http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue-and-protein-even-more-confirmation


25 posted on 11/09/2009 10:25:22 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson