Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I know the terminology they use can be confusing, but make no mistake, they are finding dino soft tissue, to enclude proteins, connective tissue, blood vessels and even blood cells:

Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation!

Mary Schweitzer announces even stronger evidence, this time from a duckbilled dino fossil, of even more proteins—and the same amazingly preserved vessel and cell structures as before.

http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue-and-protein-even-more-confirmation


25 posted on 11/09/2009 10:25:22 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

I’m heading over to read this link 3G, but here’s something I found on the dino “Dakota.”

“They believe the hippo-sized Dakota fell into a watery grave, with little oxygen present to speed along the decay process. Meanwhile, very fine sediments reacted with the soft tissues of the animal, forming a kind of cement.”


32 posted on 11/09/2009 10:48:53 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“the terminology they use can be confusing”

That’s for sure! One of the articles I read about “Dakota” referred to it as a “mummy” in one paragraph. If you just read that one sentence, you’d think one thing. But, in the following paragraph, it became clear the “mummification” was actually the fossilization of the whole body. Bones, soft tissue, and even the skin! They used a giant CT scanner to “cut” through the different layers of the fossilized “mummy.”


34 posted on 11/09/2009 11:08:54 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson