Posted on 11/09/2009 7:01:39 AM PST by Wolf13
Doug Hoffman’s narrow defeat in New York’s 23rd Congressional District special election was one of few blemishes in a nearly flawless Election Day for Republicans. But Hoffman’s strong showing — coupled with the successful uprising against Republican nominee Dede Scozzafava’s candidacy — will embolden some conservatives to consider abandoning the GOP and initiating a broader third-party movement.
As a staunch conservative Republican whose political action committee invested much in Hoffman’s campaign, I believe nothing would hurt the conservative movement, or the GOP, more. National Democrats would love nothing more than for conservatives to start looking for third-party candidates all across the country, because third-party candidates almost always lose.
Third-party talk has become a perennial post-election pastime among some conservatives. Republicans faced a similar scenario during the 2008 campaign, when many values conservatives were dissatisfied with the field of Republican candidates and threatened to leave the party and vote for a third-party candidate. Today, Hoffman’s success and the deep sense of political alienation felt by many Americans might make it seem like the right time for another third-party revolt.
At the national level, while third-party candidacies can be an important way to draw attention to issues that the two major parties are ignoring, they always fail. In 1992, Reform Party presidential candidate Ross Perot focused his campaign on the out-of-control federal deficit. And within a few years, the budget was balanced. But no third-party presidential candidate has won a plurality or a majority of the popular vote in a single state since 1968.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
....no third party candidates....not now, not ever....they lose.
This guy needs to listen to Rush. Hoffman wasn’t a third party candidate. There was no primary.
I wrote EXACTLY the same thing last Thursday in a post entitled The Folly and Futility of Third Parties and caught a lot of flak and ridicule for saying pretty much the same thing.
No third party presidential candidate has won a single state since George Wallace won five of them in 1968.
GO 3RD PARTY SARAH, WE’RE WITH YOU ...
..the Tea Party demonstrations and last Tuesday tell me that retaking the Republican Party is doable—I didn’t think so last November...
>> ....no third party candidates....not now, not ever....they lose.
If the party chooses conservative candidates, it won’t be necessary.
If they don’t choose conservative candidates, it will be necessary.
Principle above party. It’s as simple as that.
If Republicans ‘deal’ or ‘compromise’ and allow Obamacare or Cap&Tax to pass in any form, then we’ll be at the ‘last resort’ stage....
So, you’re saying NY voters should have voted for Scuzzifalfa regardless of her political views?
Third-party talk has become a perennial post-election pastime among some conservatives.
Pre-election also.
“So, you’re saying NY voters should have voted for Scuzzifalfa regardless of her political views?”
...no, I feel the GOP must be reformed from within to get back to it’s roots....the old school GOP that I used to know would never have permitted candidates like Scuzzifalfa or similar RINOs....and BTW the GOP should sue her for the $800k they gave her for her campaign.
Thank RINO party hacks, Dede and Newt. Stinking Newt. Pelosi’s friend Newt.
We have to come to the reality that the R’s are just as guilty as the D’s in putting our country on the brink of collapse and get over party loyalty. We have an unpayable debt in front of us and all I hear is the typical rearranging of the chairs on the Titanic from the R’s; “Give us back power and we’ll sink the good ship America slower than the democrats.” Is that really the solution...really?
We’d better get used to thinking outside the box for that is where the solution lays. The political elite, wheter R or D want us thinking INSIDE the box. Not me, I’m considering a whole range of ideas and only shooting down the ones that do not really fix the mess we’re in.
They provide veto power over rinos. Better a democrat than a RINO. Eventually the GOP will get the message.
I think it’s the Baraqqis strategy for 2012.
They can deliver 40% of the vote no matter what.
Watch Soros fund RINOs to attempt to split the right and win with a Clintonian plurality.
“So, you’re saying NY voters should have voted for Scuzzifalfa regardless of her political views?”
NY23 was such a whackadoodle anomaly that the regular rules do not apply. Hoffman was a Republican that went Conservative because Dede was a disastarous lib. there was no primary at all Ded dropped out and endorsed the Dem some people already voted for Dede with absentee ballots etc.
in this case i would have voted for Hoffman in a heartbeat but in most cases third parties do nothing but play spoilers.
That being said...we do not need third parties, we need to clean house in the GOP and get rid of all of the people who are pushing it to the left of center. Just as was done in this race, we need to stand up and make our voices heard.
It is also interesting to note that the Dem who did win, broke 4 campaign promises within one hour of taking office. The Dems may have won this battle, but if they continue to show their arrogance and deceive people like this, it is going to come back and bite them in the butt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.