Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions about Fort Hood shooter you won't hear from 'mainstream' press
Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 6 November, 2009 | David Codrea

Posted on 11/07/2009 5:03:37 AM PST by marktwain

(AP Photo/ Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences )

In the wake of yesterday's carnage at Fort Hood, the media is scrambling to find answers about the reported shooter, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, and his motives. While they're all asking basically the same questions, here are some they're not asking.

From Lt. Gen. Robert Cone:

Cone said in a press conference Thursday night that "there was no indication" that the weapons used in the shootings were military weapons. Soldiers at the post do not carry weapons unless they are doing training exercises or something of that nature, he said.

"This is our home," Cone said. "So we do have security guards that are here -- the MPs and the Department of the Army civilian police, but soldiers on Fort Hood do not carry weapons."

So didn't the shooter take full advantage of what is essentially a "gun free zone"?

One phenomenon the "mainstream" press is prominently highlighting is "anti-Muslim backlash." Mike Vanderboegh at Sipsey Street Irregulars notes an inconsistency:

If the attackers had been "Christian Identity" types, does anyone reading this doubt that their religious beliefs, no matter how sick and twisted, would not have been trumpeted by the state-run media?

For that matter, what do you think the Southern Poverty Law Center or the Anti-Defamation League would be saying, and do you think Chris Matthews would be giving them a forum to take full advantage of their agendas?

And here's one more question I'd really like to see people with investigative journalism team resources explore: In his position as a medical professional treating and diagnosing soldiers with mental health issues, both at Walter Reed and at Fort Hood, did Dr. Hasan report any veterans to the federal government for entry into the NICS "prohibited persons" database? In other words, have "gun control" laws enabled a mass shooter to cause the government to disarm others?

I could come up with a laundry list of other questions, but for now, these will serve to illustrate a larger point. We'll be getting answers to a lot of questions about this incident in the coming days from "Authorized Journalist" outlets. I don't expect we'll be seeing answers to these. Let's hope my cynicism proves unfounded.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; codrea; examiner; fthood; guns; military
Dave Codrea hits another good one. Examiners get paid by the hits on their work. Please click to the link.
1 posted on 11/07/2009 5:03:38 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Hasan has no moral back bone.
He didn't need to kill and maim other people in order to protest the wars.

He could have refused to go overseas and have taken the consequences for his personal decision.
Other people have gone that peaceful route.

Odds are good that the Leftist media would have made him a saint.
Being shot by a woman must have crushed Hasan's ego.

2 posted on 11/07/2009 5:12:45 AM PST by syriacus (By shooting others, instead of refusing to serve, Hasan proved he has NO moral backbone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It started,before the blood could be removed, right after it was reported that the FBI stated there was no terrorist connection...you could hear it grow louder and louder by the hour......shredding machines by the hundreds, doing what they do best.


3 posted on 11/07/2009 5:17:01 AM PST by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

so what weapon(s) did the shooter use....anyone know...or hazard a guess...?


4 posted on 11/07/2009 5:24:04 AM PST by spokeshave (Obama can't unjump the shark "Obama Wa Nobel-sho Ni Ataeshinai" ("Obama Unworthy of Nobel Prize"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TET1968
Anyone..who goes into a crowded area and opens fire is a terrorist... ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm) n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
5 posted on 11/07/2009 5:34:21 AM PST by leenie312
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
One was an FN five - seven. http://www.remtek.com/arms/fn/57/
I suspect that it will be targeted by the anti gun crowd and banned shortly.
From the manufacturers web site:

The Five-seveN® fires the SS190 5.7x28mm ball round. This projectile will perforate any individual protection on today's battlefield including the PASGT kevlar helmet, 48 layers of kevlar body armor and the CRISAT target (titanium and kevlar).

The other weapon was reportedly a revolver, but I've not seen reliable details on that one yet.

6 posted on 11/07/2009 5:37:50 AM PST by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Yes, they were not military issued, but legally purchased and registered by Hassan. Check out Fox News.


7 posted on 11/07/2009 5:41:00 AM PST by Madam Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
My initial reaction was and still is that this wimp simply did not have the cojones to point the gun at himself and save all of those wonderful and loyal people and their families this dreadful outcome.

This may turn me, with still to be revealed background information from this jerk's computer, etc.

While Florida may be God's waiting room, I recently heard that the Virgin Islands are where old whores go to prepare themselves to be one of the 72 virgins assigned to these death monkeys of Islam, as their heavenly reward. (Sorry VI's for this flat joke)

8 posted on 11/07/2009 6:01:31 AM PST by jws3sticks (Sarah Palin forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

FnH 5.7mm


9 posted on 11/07/2009 6:05:24 AM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

The 5.7 AP rounds are not available to civilians.


10 posted on 11/07/2009 7:59:24 AM PST by dtrpscout (A bad dog is better than most good people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

it was a 357 magnum revolver


11 posted on 11/08/2009 12:02:34 PM PST by Armedanddangerous (I think youre so full of inconsolable rage you don't care who you hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
With all due respect, this column has not been excerpted as per due diligent fair use copyright.

Unless the author or his/her agent has specifically negotiated reprint rights to specific entities, it is disrespectful to deny them the fruits of their creative labor.

We, the Freepers, must police ourselves or be policed by others.

Best regards,

12 posted on 11/08/2009 7:50:33 PM PST by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson