I read the whole article. What are the errors that you see?
"the Darwinian explanation wins by default,"
I missed your comment until tonight when I was going back and looking for another one.
An example error is this: “This is nothing unusual, because most biologists working in this field have come to accept Darwinism as their interpretative paradigm. “
Darwinism is very far out of date...the current paradigm is far more advanced than this strawman.