Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I suspect that scientists are starting to back out of global warming hoax without incurring wrath of environment activists and politicians.
1 posted on 10/29/2009 10:16:25 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster

Robust, or simply bust?

It looks like, if not cooling yet, the globe has stopped warming for about a decade.


2 posted on 10/29/2009 10:18:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but — which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This 'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both. --Stephen H. Schneider, Ph.D.
3 posted on 10/29/2009 10:24:35 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Bump for Friday reading


4 posted on 10/29/2009 10:24:47 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Photobucket
7 posted on 10/29/2009 10:52:50 PM PDT by GloriaJane (http://www.last.fm/user/GloriaJane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

8 posted on 10/30/2009 12:53:42 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I suspect that scientists are starting to back out of global warming hoax without incurring wrath of environment activists and politicians.

They have to be very careful so they can avoid the establishment's wrath and lose their ability to sponge off taxpayers grant funding.

9 posted on 10/30/2009 2:30:20 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Myles Allen, head of the Climate Dynamics Group at the University of Oxford, said: “Some claims that were made about the ice anomaly were misleading. A lot of people said this is the beginning of the end of Arctic ice, and of course it recovered the following year and everybody looked a bit silly.”

Yes. More than a bit silly.

Dr Allen said that predictions of how the world was likely to warm also needed to be framed carefully.

As you say Tiger, these people are trying to back out of the hoax, but to retain a look of credibility.

12 posted on 11/01/2009 8:15:20 PM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson