[jwparkerjr]

IMHO this is a large part of what's wrong our justice system these days. She was convicted of having sex with a 14-year-old student. Unless there's something we're not being told she was never a threat to the kids of her family and friends. Certainly those parents should have sense enough to keep an eye on her when she's around their kids. The system doesn't seem to have, or be willing to exercise, any common sense in order save themselves time and effort. Time and effort that could be used to address some of the real criminals that walk our streets.

I am not condoning what she did. But to make her have to have a court order to be with the kids in her family is a bit much in my humble opinion.

[Always Right]

[ElkGroveDan]

Just thought I’d take a moment to weigh in with “not guilty”.

[tet68]

She has paid her debt to society, I cannot see how
denying her relations with her own family has any
meaningful use. Leave her alone.

By the way, Not Guilty.

[Bigg Red]

Unless there’s something we’re not being told she was never a threat to the kids of her family and friends.

&&
Pedophiles cannot be trusted around kids.

[afraidfortherepublic]

How has Miss “too pretty to go to jail” “paid her debt to society”? She didn’t even have to go to jail. And she broke her probation already at her job. This woman has a screw loose, and I wouldn’t want her around ANY children — related, or not.

[CaptRon]

I would be more than happy for her to have contact with me.

And I AM of age.

And Laz's "I'd hit it" would be unfunny and stupid. Who wouldn't?

The real question would be would she allow it?