Posted on 10/25/2009 12:24:37 PM PDT by AJKauf
It's one thing for police to knock on the door and tell the person that other people can see him and have complained and to put some clothes on. It's quite another for them to take it to the lengths that they're taking it: arresting him and then passing out flyers around the neighborhood and sending children home with information in an effort to find out if anyone else saw anything. This case has been taken to incredible lengths.
Goodnight! :) See you on your next anti-jack-booted thread.
Link?
Or dismiss.
Link?
Or Dismiss.
“Whats not in dispute here is that the man “ was too drunk remember what he did.
Yeah, that was the other reason the woman’s husband’s occupation might conceivably be relevant. I thought about that too, but I forgot to mention it. (If he picks up on that he’ll say I “lied”.) I wouldn’t try to convince ColdWater though. I don’t know how man times I told him I cared very little to not at all that the woman was a cop’s wife. He’s completely unreasoning despite repeated attempts to explain politely. He obviously has a burr up his butt about this issue for some reason beyond what he’s put in his posts.
I even went so far as to google “still thinking jack booted thugs” like he said, and most hits were random pages that just had those five words in them. So I added freerepublic.com and put “Still Thinking” in quotes, and the relevance got a little better plus revealing an obvious flaw to his idea. Most of this hits were for this very thread, where I never used the phrase once. By his “logic”, he must be a cop hater.
Now, like you, I don’t know if I ever used the phrase or not. If I did, and was doing so in a way that purported to represent my own judgement, rather than in reference, I’m sure I was in a thread about people who could aptly be described in that way. My point in telling you about how hard it is to find relevant pages by Googling, and even harder (maybe impossible) to find damning evidence, is that he’s either bluffing or he actually opened pages beyond the first twenty hits or so which is something only an obsessed person would do. Even with hits narrowed to better relevance, I got bored after about the first 6. That idiot is like a rabid dog or something.
I was shocked by that “NOT GUILTY!” verdict, myself.
And I’m a (hetero) woman.
Ah, just deny saying it and you will find my post ASAP. BTW, I found your 'jack-booted thugs' posts in about 2 minutes. You have to know how to work google.
You know, I had forgotten all about y'all. I usually do unless one is a fool to try to engage me like you are.
Why did you bring it up, then .... OTOH, the anti-jack-booted crowd always seems to circle around even when the person is married, related or even friends with a cop.
Yes. I used the following logic: If John Doe posts a biasd post on a 'jack-booted thug thread started by an anti-jack-boot thug guy I have a pretty high probability that John Doe hangs out with that crowd and a google search will expose John Doe. (please replace "John Doe" with "Still Thinking" to see what happened to you.
Dismissed.
This is killing you, isn't it. Wondering how I found your jack-booted thug posts .... OK. I confess. I have an AI search engine that runs 24 hours a day searching for anti-jack-booted thug posts. It archives the data, and anytime I make a reply to someone, it pops a window showing their posting profile
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.