I even went so far as to google “still thinking jack booted thugs” like he said, and most hits were random pages that just had those five words in them. So I added freerepublic.com and put “Still Thinking” in quotes, and the relevance got a little better plus revealing an obvious flaw to his idea. Most of this hits were for this very thread, where I never used the phrase once. By his “logic”, he must be a cop hater.
Now, like you, I don’t know if I ever used the phrase or not. If I did, and was doing so in a way that purported to represent my own judgement, rather than in reference, I’m sure I was in a thread about people who could aptly be described in that way. My point in telling you about how hard it is to find relevant pages by Googling, and even harder (maybe impossible) to find damning evidence, is that he’s either bluffing or he actually opened pages beyond the first twenty hits or so which is something only an obsessed person would do. Even with hits narrowed to better relevance, I got bored after about the first 6. That idiot is like a rabid dog or something.
Ah, just deny saying it and you will find my post ASAP. BTW, I found your 'jack-booted thugs' posts in about 2 minutes. You have to know how to work google.
You know, I had forgotten all about y'all. I usually do unless one is a fool to try to engage me like you are.
Yes. I used the following logic: If John Doe posts a biasd post on a 'jack-booted thug thread started by an anti-jack-boot thug guy I have a pretty high probability that John Doe hangs out with that crowd and a google search will expose John Doe. (please replace "John Doe" with "Still Thinking" to see what happened to you.
This is killing you, isn't it. Wondering how I found your jack-booted thug posts .... OK. I confess. I have an AI search engine that runs 24 hours a day searching for anti-jack-booted thug posts. It archives the data, and anytime I make a reply to someone, it pops a window showing their posting profile