Posted on 10/25/2009 9:59:16 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Mystery deepens over what distracted pilots on plane that overshot by 150 miles
The mystery of the Northwest Airlines plane that overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles has deepened after the first officer insisted that he and the pilot were not asleep or arguing.
By Philip Sherwell in New York
Published: 6:39PM BST 24 Oct 2009
The mystery of the Northwest Airlines plane that overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles has deepened after the first officer insisted that he and the pilot were not asleep or arguing. Pilots on the Northwest Airlines plane that overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles will not say what they were doing Photo: AP
Richard Cole refuted two explanations put forward for the strange case of NW flight 188 when the cockpit crew was out of radio contact for more than an hour after flying past Minneapolis, their final stop on Wednesday evening.
"Nobody was asleep in the cockpit. No arguments took place," Mr Cole told a local television station from his home in Oregon. "But other than that, I cannot tell you anything that went on because we're having hearings this weekend, we're having hearings on Tuesday. All that information will come out then."
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
I think you might be right. Remember the Air France crew that was fired for posting a video on the internet of an air hostess undressing in the "cockpit" and displaying herself to the crew?
I was thinking of the Green Bay Triangle...As I recall that is where Brett Favre disappeared.
He’s surfaced in Pittsburgh today ...
Makes you wonder about the “pilots’ union”...
No, my Mercedes does that with the cruise control crash-avoidance software!
Perhaps they accidentally hit the Warp Drive button for a second or two...whooooshhhh...
It wasn’t long ago on a Southwest flight that I went forward and observed a flight attendant sitting in her jump seat and talking on her cell inflight. Cell phones ‘off’ rules are only for us apparently.
The pilots were just snatched away, their private parts examined by little gray guys with big heads, and then, as they zoned out, they were stuffed right back in their seats.
The UFO pacing their flight got too close and ‘fowled up’ their electromagnetic signalling sytstems.
You’ve never been on the regular lanes of I95 rolling into DC!
Maybe the last hot stewardess was on that flight.....
The article doesn’t say at what point in the flight Air Traffic was unable to contact the aircraft. Ordinarily, the enroute controller would hand the aircraft off to the apporach controller and begin the descent to land about 40 - 60 miles from the destination. We also don’t know what air traffic facility had control of the aircraft, Minneapolis Center or Minneapolis approach control. If the handoff was already completed from Center to approach control the aircraft’s speed would have been reduced.
WHat a thoughtful and insightful post. Thanks
Oh, the poor media...left out of the loop....
They weren’t answering the radio well before they got to Minneapolis the first time. They were asleep....
No, they would have been alerted by lack of radio communication if they had a wrong frequency and had been awake.
Air planes fly in and out of various frequency sectors. Simple inattentiveness can lead to prolonged periods of non-radio contact.
The radios never really go silent, as there will almost always be some frequency chatter heard from other vicinity aircraft, even when out of range of the ATC transmitter, due to the extended line-of-sight maintained between high altitude aircraft.
Once it is realized that radio contact with ATC has been lost, finding a frequency that works for the existing location takes some research. Modern airliners do not monitor “guard” frequency the way military aircraft do.
Often times, ATC will call the airline dispatch to get an ACARS message (called SELCAL) to the crew to alert them to the problem.
This is not a totally isolated occurrance. But when coupled with an improperly set up FMC, it can lead to major embarrassment and loss of safety margin.
I really doubt the “asleep” assumption.
Not really. Any en-route IFR chart has a list of relevant frequencies on it. "Simple inattentiveness" includes a snooze, of course. It wouldn't be the first time the whole cockpit crew fell asleep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.