Skip to comments.
To Close the Deficit, Federal Income Tax Rates Would Have to Nearly Triple
Tax Foundation ^
| October 22, 2009
Posted on 10/24/2009 6:42:46 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Harrius Magnus; mojitojoe; Pelham; mom2twinsn2; LongLiveTheRepublic; ConservativeOrBust; ...
The Peter Schiff/Redistribution Watch Ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!) The conventional wisdom both parties is that we can devalue the dollar forever and soon the foreigners can hire us all for free. Wait, is that good??
21
posted on
10/24/2009 7:12:50 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
To: reaganaut1
Does this take into account a declining tax base as Baby Boomers leave the work force?
22
posted on
10/24/2009 7:19:07 PM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: reaganaut1
I'm already losing half of everything I earn to taxes. Triple? I'll take a job a Jack in the Box or Walmart instead of one doing software engineering at nearly $150k annually. The thieves in DC don't understand that people won't pull the cart if there is no reward for the work.
23
posted on
10/24/2009 7:20:16 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: reaganaut1; Taxman; Principled; EternalVigilance; phil_will1; kevkrom; Bigun; PeteB570; FBD; ...
This would be a moot point if Congress passed The Fair Tax Act(H.R.25/S.296) that would replace all federal income taxes with a national sales tax and abolish the IRS. A national sales tax will broaden the tax base by including illegals aliens, foreigners visiting the U.S. and the unemployed who do not pay income taxes. Fair Tax ping!
24
posted on
10/24/2009 7:27:42 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: reaganaut1
DON’T GIVE THEM ANY IDEAS!
25
posted on
10/24/2009 7:32:49 PM PDT
by
denydenydeny
("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
To: Graybeard58
How do you have a tax rate OVER 100%?
26
posted on
10/24/2009 7:33:28 PM PDT
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: reaganaut1
I’m sorry, at WHAT percent of unemployment do these numbers work? What if the unemployment doubles beyond their numbers, do they tax those workers with jobs at 6x?
To: ladyjane
The other half pay six times.
28
posted on
10/24/2009 7:44:55 PM PDT
by
Leisler
(It's going to be a hard, long winter)
To: reaganaut1
The liberals have no problem with tripling the tax rate.
29
posted on
10/24/2009 7:45:56 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: RC2
It is my firm belief that if we had a resonable government... And if my Aunt had a ****, she'd be my Uncle.
30
posted on
10/24/2009 7:48:56 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: jroneil
I believe that is what Obama wants to do. He will destroy the economy, make the dollar worthless, destroy the nation and proudly proclaim that he paid off the debt.
31
posted on
10/24/2009 7:49:41 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: reaganaut1
This is all by design. As long as there is a Federal Reserve system, we will never, ever not run debts. Both parties run the debt to greater and greater levels.
32
posted on
10/24/2009 7:54:09 PM PDT
by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: reaganaut1
"the high tax rates necessary to balance the budget in the next several years would discourage all income-producing endeavors," Ahern said."No kidding.
33
posted on
10/24/2009 8:04:25 PM PDT
by
Think free or die
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money - M.Thatcher)
To: Mojave
"No mention of the Laffer Curve" Exactly.
The tax rate that generates the greatest revenue to the Treasury has been proved, I think, to be 22% of GDP.
Therefore, since the U.S. has an average of at least 35% of GDP, ANY INCREASE IN TAXES WILL DECREASE REVENUES TO THE TREASURY!!!
The way to get more revenues to "Close the Deficit" is to cut taxes. People will work more, and tax revenues to the Treasury will climb.
Even smart Libs know this. It just doesn't win votes.
34
posted on
10/24/2009 8:05:52 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(0bummer attacks not Unemployment, the Taliban, Deficits, China, or the Sudan, but attacks FOX.)
To: reaganaut1
35
posted on
10/24/2009 8:21:29 PM PDT
by
murphE
("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." - GK Chesterton)
To: reaganaut1
A better idea:
Reduce the size of Fedzilla by 66%
36
posted on
10/24/2009 8:40:59 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: DTogo; reaganaut1; dcwusmc
Reduce the size of Fedzilla by 66%The best idea: shrink Fedzilla to its Constitutional bounds...so small that it can be readily drowned in a bathtub, if the need should arise.
37
posted on
10/24/2009 8:43:58 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: rabscuttle385
...if the need should arise. The need has arisen!
38
posted on
10/24/2009 8:51:34 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: reaganaut1
“What the Obama administration isn’t telling Americans is that the only practical solution is a giant tax increase aimed squarely at the middle class”
- One doesnt need a Ph.D in economics (or anything else for that matter) to know this. We all knew this was coming. Obama’s insane spending spree will have to be paid back by enormous taxes, which will mean another Depression, or CW. Or, just maybe people will figure out ways to earn a living that do not involves giving 50% of our hard-earned to Pelosi and Co. to blow on their special social projects.
If the citizenry ever finds an anonymous way to earn a living (either on or off the net), then the govt will truly send every thug with a badge their way. And it will be bloody.
To: rabscuttle385
"The best idea: shrink Fedzilla to its Constitutional bounds...so small that it can be readily drowned in a bathtub, if the need should arise."That sounds about right. If we could radically shrink the monster, there would be lots of free enterprise opportunities in (privately) replacing those functions of government which have value. Doing away with the massive layers of regulation and control would free up our entrepreneurial spirit and encourage investment in new businesses.
Big question - what would we do with all the excess lawyers - export them?
40
posted on
10/24/2009 9:03:54 PM PDT
by
Think free or die
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money - M.Thatcher)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson