>>All coming from someone who can lay no claim to a degree in science himself.<<
One does not need a degree in science to understand it. One need but to understand it. If I am wrong, I, as always, invite you to tell me where I am scientifically wrong.
>>Still trying to figure out on what basis you continue to lecture people with degrees in science on what science is all about.<<
When people use astrology in place of astronomy, any layperson with a telescope, a stopwatch and a 100-YO star chart is in a position to claim science over superstition.
And please tell us who on these threads who do not understand science have science degrees. If it is you, then please post your understanding of what a Scientific Theory is. Then you can explain how TToE does not pass muster AND how an ID does. We all await your (or any “scientist”) response.
Your constant ad hominem attacks on my posts do nothing to advance your cause.
And that saddens me, because I think you are a good, if very addled, person.
The worst part is that you think that by advancing ignorance as a cause you are doing God’s work, when it is Satan that laughs at delight at your spreading willful ignorance.
I think she is a good person also. Too bad she is confused over the number of gods in the universe.