Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too Much of a Good Thing? Public Health Plan Could Have Huge Advantage in Market
FoxNews ^ | October 23rd 2009

Posted on 10/23/2009 1:57:50 PM PDT by Steelfish

Too Much of a Good Thing? Public Health Plan Could Have Huge Advantage in Market

Under the plan being pushed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a government-run health insurance plan would provide nearly the same benefits as the other private plans in a new insurance exchange, at a fraction of the cost.

By Judson Berger FOXNews.com Friday, October 23, 2009

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi discusses health care at a news conference on Capitol Hill Oct. 23, as Rep. James Clyburn looks on. (AP Photo)

With 350 employees covered under his auto dealership's health care plan, Burt Brenner said a government-run insurance plan might be too good to resist.

Brenner, the chief financial officer at Lindsay Automotive in Alexandria, Va., said that private premiums have been increasing for 10 years, even when claims don't warrant it, and a "very attractive" element of the public plan is that it could stop that "rollercoaster."

"We would consider a public plan to reduce premiums if the benefits of the plan were comparable to that of our private plan," he said.

So would millions of others -- according to estimates of the sweeping impact a government-run health plan could have.

Under the plan being pushed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a government-run plan would provide nearly the same benefits as the other private plans in a new insurance exchange, but at a fraction of the cost.

This would make the public plan an attractive deal. But it could also lead to an exodus of customers from private insurance -- a scenario conservatives fear will be the first step toward a single-payer system where the government is the sole insurance provider. And that, they say, would inflict further damage on the expanding deficit.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aboutthoseoldpeople; cuttingmedicare; democrats

1 posted on 10/23/2009 1:57:51 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Where’s the massive barf alert? It would cost more than anybody could imagine.


2 posted on 10/23/2009 1:58:38 PM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
The public option will allow for a Cloward-Piven effect on the entire system, causing it to crash and be rescued by our wonderful socialists in D.C.
3 posted on 10/23/2009 2:01:52 PM PDT by PDMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The problem with all of these projections is that they always assume the current level of health is a constant that will remain so no matter how it gets divided up. That is a fallacy, since the plans will invariably impact incentives and almost certainly result in a decrease in services, i.e., fewer doctors and less profit. Shortages in services can have no outcome besides rationing, and not the kind that is a result of market dynamics but the kind that is controlled by bureaucratic fiat.
4 posted on 10/23/2009 2:05:18 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Under the plan being pushed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a government-run plan would provide nearly the same benefits as the other private plans in a new insurance exchange, but at a fraction of the cost.

Sure it would. I mean, if you just legislate a lower price, then everything will be cheaper. Won't that be great?

Ah cahn't change the laws of economics, Captain!


5 posted on 10/23/2009 2:05:55 PM PDT by Maceman (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
With 350 employees covered under his auto dealership's health care plan, Burt Brenner said a government-run insurance plan might be too good to resist.

Winner of Most Obvious to Happen quote of the day.

Thus putting control of your life in the Governments greedy claws!

6 posted on 10/23/2009 2:05:59 PM PDT by rocksblues (Sarah and Joe, Real Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Doctors will have their pay cut by 90%. They can make it up in volume, right??


7 posted on 10/23/2009 2:06:07 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Under the plan being pushed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a government-run health insurance plan would provide nearly the same benefits as the other private plans in a new insurance exchange, at a fraction of the cost.

Amazing.

All we have to do is pass a law and everything, especially health care goes down to a fraction of the cost.

Can they pass a law about everything?

Of course they can .... :-)

schu

8 posted on 10/23/2009 2:09:31 PM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I don’t believe one word that comes out of her lying mouth. If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.


9 posted on 10/23/2009 2:22:29 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://www.vacinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
How many insurance plans are backed by a company which can run a trillion and a half dollar deficit with barely a squawk from the board of directors?

Once the government has driven the competition out of the market by running a trillion dollar loss leader sale, then they can charge whatever they want... forever.

10 posted on 10/23/2009 2:30:46 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Soon everyone will win a Nobel Peace Prize for not being George Bush...well, except for George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schu

I want my G5 and all the fuel I can burn for a fraction of the cost.

Can we get that passed? Quickly, no debates please, we all agree we have to do something.


11 posted on 10/23/2009 2:58:11 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“a government-run health insurance plan would provide nearly the same benefits as the other private plans in a new insurance exchange, at a fraction of the cost.”

The media never writes, or speaks, with economic honesty.

No government plan comes “at a fraction of the cost” to any private plan.

A portion of the full cost is simply transferred from our private economic decisions to additional taxes imposed to cover the portion of the amount that the government is subsidizing.

Even the person who pays for this wonderful “lower cost” government plan will, somewhere in their private economic transactions, be paying taxes to help cover the difference between what they are charged for their monthly premium and its true cost.

There are no cost savings anywhere in the plan, simply cost shifting, from the private economy to taxes.


12 posted on 10/23/2009 3:12:52 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Indeed. I don’t know why people accept the notion that this is “competition”. The government has an unlimited budget.


13 posted on 10/23/2009 4:44:46 PM PDT by modhom (deficits=inflation+taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: socialismisinsidious


Socialized Medicine aka Universal Health Care daily digest PING LIST

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or removed from this daily digest ping list (one ping per day of links to pertinent articles).




14 posted on 10/24/2009 5:30:06 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson