To: Alter Kaker
No way. He’d immediately turn off more than half the country. He would instantly have a negative/positive ratio similar to Rush’s.
Which is fine, as long as you’re not looking for elected office.
3 posted on
10/23/2009 9:46:31 AM PDT by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: chuck_the_tv_out
Not half.
Maybe 10-20% that are full blown leftists who are convinced Fox News is EVIL!
But it would be fun watching them froth at the mouth...
9 posted on
10/23/2009 9:50:05 AM PDT by
astyanax
(Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
To: chuck_the_tv_out
I kinda think if Rush ran, the results would be totally stunning. But he wouldn’t take the pay cut.
46 posted on
10/23/2009 12:16:36 PM PDT by
Safetgiver
(I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
To: chuck_the_tv_out
He would instantly have a negative/positive ratio similar to Rush’s.In other words, the Republicans need a stealth candidate with deep conservative roots, no track record, and an ability to convince the nanny staters that he's on their side when he really isn't.
51 posted on
10/23/2009 12:22:37 PM PDT by
NotSoModerate
(Obama's spin isn't ordinary, it's roller coaster ride after a few beers spin.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson