Posted on 10/23/2009 2:29:59 AM PDT by STARWISE
This is news .. the DOJ has officially notified CA Judge David Carter, presently reviewing his next move in the Keyes et al v. Obama et al lawsuit ... of a GA judge's decision in the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit.
______________________________________________________
It clearly shows that Judge Carter doesn’t deserve to be addressed as such the guy is looking for the easy way out while making sure not to upset the Usurper-in-Chief. I may be wrong but Carter has sold out.
-David Crockett
Maybe Judge Carter was waiting for Judge Simandle’s ruling granting dismissal in the Kerchner case. It came down Tuesday and the DOJ just made Judge Carter officially aware of it.
I believe Judge Carter must be waiting for something because after reading more of the court proceedings it’s become clear he would find it hard to rule against barry no matter where his birth. So why else is he delaying his ruling?
Is this typical judicial conduct for DOJ ?
~~Ding!
..Also on 10/22 glenn beck show, beck strongly hinted that bob bauer is getting white house job, possibly the new obama white house counsel!!
That’s my speculation as well .. rumors about
WH Counsel leaving have been circulating.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comment from article link:
###
If the DOJ had any contact with Judge carter outside of the case with out Orly being present to excude this new finding of the other case than the judge is by all means a crook.
The law does not allow any party to the a pending case to have counsel be it writing and or verbal in the matters affecting this case without both counsels being present.
Orly should kick judge Carter’s butt.
He should and has to recuse himself from the case at once if not then we need to go stand in his front yard day and night and protest. The judge is also required by law to arrest whom ever tainted his pending case that is the rule of law. Period.
It's typical, and proper, conduct for any attorney arguing a case in federal court. It's simply a matter of fowarding a decision recently made in another federal court case that has elements in common with the case being decided, and asking the judge to "notice" the ruling.
If Kerchner had been decided in favor of the plaintiffs, Orly could/should have done the same.
Having read many things written by Orly Taitz over the past year or so, I’m beginning to recognize her rather distinctive take on the English language.
She wrote that blog comment herself, imho.
FYI - The Kerchner lawsuit was in NJ not GA.
Ping to article questioning DOJ actions.
Well so much for the "Judge Carter is a stand-up Marine, and once a Marine always a Marine" argument. The Birthers are already turning on him.
Correct me if I'm wrong but hasn't Taitz submitted at least two motions to the judge after the October 5th hearing? Without attorneys from both sides being involved? There was the emergency ex-parte motion for relief from stay of discovery and the request for judicial notice that I recall, there may well have been more. Are you saying that those were improper as well?
Yes. When handling multiple cases stemming from the same complaint or cause of action, the party that gets good treatment in another venue brings that fact into each affected case. The DOJ did this with the multiple lawsuits that challenged the president's authority to conduct the Terrorist Surveillance Program and other assorted warrantless surveillance.
Can anyone here speak English?
That’s exactly what I was thinking, though Orly’s motions may be a case of “hooray for our side.”
Barnett and other military oath takers, like Kirchner, may not get standing. However, I do feel Carter will allow third-party presidential candidates, like Keyes, to move forward.
There was an active duty junior officer who was recently promoted even though he called Obama a usurper. Now we need an active duty field-grade officer to step forward, like Major Cook.
I don’t see a big problem with this, other than it just looks bad, but it seems a reasonable thing for an attorney to do. It is looking more and more like no judge or court in this country is going to open this can of worms on Obama. It’s a very sad testimony on the rule of law and the state of our constitution in America today. It’s time for citizens to start drawing up articles of impeachment, much like they did with the grand juries. Everyday brings another abuse of power and dereliction of duty from Obama and his administration. Other presidents have been impeached for far less than what Obama has already done.
Don't count your chicks before they've clucked.
OTOH, the country has ALREADY turned on the egg-laying bird-brained
Progressive-in-chief.
Did the DOJ go to CA for a cup of coffee?......... Then that maybe worth a line or two on some blog......
Thank you.
Okay .. thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
