Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC's Jake Tapper Asks Gibbs Why It's Appropriate For White House To Decide Who's A News Org.
Newsbusters.org ^ | 10-20-09 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 10/20/2009 3:50:15 PM PDT by Justaham

On Tuesday, another prominent media member challenged the White House strategy of attacking the Fox News Channel.

This time up at the plate was ABC's Jake Tapper who asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs during today's gaggle:

It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one?

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhopress; foxnews; liberalfascism; obama; tapper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2009 3:50:15 PM PDT by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Jake, Jake, Jake.....

You didn’t get the memo, Jake?


2 posted on 10/20/2009 3:51:26 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Already posted.


3 posted on 10/20/2009 3:52:16 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Beware of the deposits from the winged swine... and now might be a good time to set up a skate shop in Hades. Tapper’s days at the WH numbered after this?


4 posted on 10/20/2009 3:53:02 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Obama-care won't pull Grandma's plug - because Grandma won't be plugged in under Obama-care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

It’s funny how Obama and his minions never targeted Beck when he was employed by CNN and their arm, HLN......


5 posted on 10/20/2009 3:53:41 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR.....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I guess since the WH doesn’t ‘control’ FOX News, they’ve decided to ‘bypass that filter’.


6 posted on 10/20/2009 3:54:43 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Jake Tapper is (IMO) one of the very few true journalists in the WH press corps.

Wouldn’t it be interesting if the other news organizations suddenly realized that there are viewers (and therefore $$$$$) for news organizations that ask tough cynical queations of a shaky communist administration — and demanded that more Jake Tappers step up to the plate?

If that were to happen, the look on Gibb’s gay little pink face would be precious. And Axholerod would blow a bearing.

And Bambi would be finished.


7 posted on 10/20/2009 3:54:45 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Already posted.
________________

Well, I’m glad it was posted again.


8 posted on 10/20/2009 3:54:52 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

So the pontificating pansy of the podium got slapped down?

Sweet!


9 posted on 10/20/2009 3:57:20 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Amen. I hadn’t seen it.


10 posted on 10/20/2009 3:57:44 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Tapper is trying to explain this to his colleagues.

Too many of his colleagues are so partisan that they don’t see the slippery slope the are riding on.

It’s a short trip from the current level of criticism to the revocation of White House press credentials. The Fox war is about government control of the press.


11 posted on 10/20/2009 3:58:26 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

What will be even more interesting is when/if the media actually wakes up one morning and realizes:

When they came for Fox news, I said nothing, because I didn’t work for fox news (or Jake Tapper)

Its going to be fun and sad at the same time as one by one “journalists” and Newspeak programs start to report a little negatively and POOF, there was no one left to speak for them.........


12 posted on 10/20/2009 3:58:51 PM PDT by wombtotomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Amen. I hadn’t seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You’re right. Some of us aren’t on FR 24/7.


13 posted on 10/20/2009 3:59:15 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

And Gibbs responded how?


14 posted on 10/20/2009 3:59:41 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

lol.

WH knows the vast majority of the media will fall into line and follow orders.

Praise the disciple of Jeremiah Wright or else.


15 posted on 10/20/2009 4:02:58 PM PDT by GeronL (They Made It Happen On Purpose Economically. MIHOPE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

When ABC starts defending Fox News you know the White House is in trouble


16 posted on 10/20/2009 4:03:33 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“And Gibbs responded how?”

“Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.”

To which Tapper should have replied “Ok let’s watch it here together. It’s a date then?”


17 posted on 10/20/2009 4:09:00 PM PDT by Never on my watch (The lunatics are in the White House - meet me on the dark side of the Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
It’s a short trip from the current level of criticism to the revocation of White House press credentials. The Fox war is about government control of the press.

Exactly. Thank god someone else gets that this is not just a snarky skirmish. The Obama regime is setting the table for followup action, based on planting the meme that Fox isn't news media. And if they are not news media, then they are not eligible for certain priviliges, and they are not protected by certain rights.

These rat-bastards are not just playing footsie. They want Fox off the air.

18 posted on 10/20/2009 4:17:24 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Truth--The liberal's Kryptonite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Spot the difference: Obama Administration, Hugo Chavez Administration.


19 posted on 10/20/2009 4:19:18 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Was it residual journalism or perhaps Jake had heard "When they came for the Jews, I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew...".

If so, that shows more sense than I usually credit the average whornalist.

20 posted on 10/20/2009 4:19:49 PM PDT by magslinger (Inside every father is a Bryan Mills waiting to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson