Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian Supreme National Security Council Advisor: 'Circumstances May Arise Under Which Iran...
MEMRI.org - Special Dispatch - No. 2605 ^ | October 19, 2009 | n/a

Posted on 10/20/2009 3:42:56 AM PDT by Cindy

"Iranian Supreme National Security Council Advisor: 'Circumstances May Arise Under Which Iran Will Require Uranium Enriched to 63%'"

SNIPPET: "Talks began today, October 19, 2009, in Vienna between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency about the proposal made a few weeks ago by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in advance of the October 1, 2009 talks between Iran and the 5+1 in Geneva."

(Excerpt) Read more at memri.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: enrichuranium; iran; nuclear; uranium

1 posted on 10/20/2009 3:42:56 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cindy
'Circumstances May Arise Under Which Iran Will Require Uranium Enriched to 63%'"

5+1 in Geneva."

OK, I'm going to apply Calypso Louie Farrakhan logic to this one.......

Sixty three percent....add six and three and you have nine. The five plus one in Geneva. Put the nine side by side with the five and you have ninety-five. The ninety-five percent mark is weapons grade uranium. Add the plus one and you have one atomic bomb.

2 posted on 10/20/2009 3:59:55 AM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

The Iranians just experienced their worse terrorist attack ever and they believe the terrorist organization responsible for the attack is based inside a neighboring country that already possesses nuclear weapons. Pakistan. No one is going to be able to use negotiation to get them to give up their desire to possess nukes. No one.


3 posted on 10/20/2009 4:12:42 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I believe likely Iran is driving for thermonuclear weapon.
Plutonium from the Teheran research reactor 5mw, removed @ 1987, would have been enough for the trigger, the 20% u235 replacement, 116-118 kg, enough for two casings. Lithium being mined in Iran, and N Korea recent tests “may” have been plutonium trigger test size @ also.

The focusing on the 95% HEU is very short sighted. Notice also possible other sources of plutonium. 2003 unclassified report on Iran mentioned also plutonium separation “glovebox”equipment not declared.

One for Israel, one for USA, about 10-20 megatons each, would no doubt hasten the Mahdi’s return from the well.


4 posted on 10/20/2009 5:12:34 AM PDT by kendwell (The task.... is not yours to finish. Nor are you to refrain from it altogether)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kendwell
One for Israel, one for USA, about 10-20 megatons each, would no doubt hasten the Mahdi’s return from the well.

Maybe we should drop one of them on that well and seal that little son-of-a-b*tch in there for good.


5 posted on 10/20/2009 5:17:42 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Hope....Change...Bullsh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson