Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman found dead in car was pregnant; boyfriend charged (first degree murder of "unborn")
Philadelphia Daily News ^ | 10/17/2009 | WILLIAM BENDER & DANA DiFILIPPO

Posted on 10/17/2009 12:35:42 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen

Selene Raynor, a Philadelphia High School for Girls graduate and an aspiring dentist enrolled at West Chester University, didn't care what anybody thought of her. --snip-- Hart has been charged with murdering Raynor, first-degree murder of her unborn child, and related offenses. Police are tracing the origin of the weapon.

Clark said last night that the fatal shooting followed "an argument that was in reference to the pregnancy." He declined to discuss whether Hart was the father.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: abortion; domesticviolence; fetalhomocide; seleneraynor; teenpregnancy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Yes you read the right; The boy friend was charged with first degree murder of the "unborn child"..
1 posted on 10/17/2009 12:35:42 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
Yet the unmitigated slaughter of unborn children through abortion goes unabated and is LEGAL??????? Maybe in the eyes of liberals but not in the eyes of God. THEY WILL PAY!! On Judgment Day, they WILL PAY!!
2 posted on 10/17/2009 12:39:12 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Got Questions? Need Answers? LOOK TO THE CROSS! You will find them there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Only the mother has the “right” to kill her unborn child.


3 posted on 10/17/2009 12:39:47 PM PDT by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

first degree????

...he wont fry in philadelphia


4 posted on 10/17/2009 12:40:58 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
And yet, a female can go into an abortion clinic and MURDER her UNBORN through a “doctor” or an intern who “promised to do no harm” under the Hippocratic Oath.
5 posted on 10/17/2009 12:41:05 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Or maybe if the boyfriend was a “doctor” or an intern, then it would be okay?

It’s an upside down world.


6 posted on 10/17/2009 12:41:50 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

That’s the Lacy Peterson law whatever the name is. Remember it was signed into law under Bush when Scott Peterson killed Lacy with her pregnant?

That is why I always questioned how we can have that law but abortion is not considered murder.


7 posted on 10/17/2009 12:42:57 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Bush Signs ‘Laci and Conner’s Law’

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115825,00.html

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Thursday signed into law a bill that would make it a separate crime to kill or harm an unborn child during an assault on the mother.

“As of today, the law of our nation will acknowledge the plain fact that crimes of violence against a pregnant woman often have two victims,” Bush said before the signing of the measure.

“The death of an innocent unborn child has too often been treated as a detail in one crime but not a crime in itself,” the president said.

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act (search) makes it a crime to harm a fetus during an assault on a pregnant woman. Bush signed the bill, which took five years to get through Congress, in an elaborate Rose Garden ceremony.


8 posted on 10/17/2009 12:44:50 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

Remember, consistancy of rules or laws just simply isn’t an issue with leftists.

It’s their goals that matter.

And, from a strictly humanist viewpoint, if the woman wanted the baby, then it’s a baby, and killing it is murder. If she doesn’t, then it’s not a baby, and killing it is a “reproductive choice”.

Humanists and Satanists only differ in the degree of whom they think they are working for.


9 posted on 10/17/2009 12:47:41 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

gubmint don’t like competition in the slaughter of unborn babies...


10 posted on 10/17/2009 12:51:51 PM PDT by Ancient Drive (DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Hmmmmm, in one instance a baby is a “fetus” and another instance the “fetus” is a baby. Am not sure what the difference is (sarc).


11 posted on 10/17/2009 12:53:50 PM PDT by alabama_heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

Don’t you worry ... The One will overturn the “Lacy Peterson Law” by Executive Order.


12 posted on 10/17/2009 12:55:32 PM PDT by EDINVA (Obama CAN'T see the Olympics from his back porch !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

11 years ago the niece of a close friend of mine was murdered, by her husband, 3 days before she was scheduled to give birth by cesarean. Had he not covered up her body it is believed the baby would have survived. Unfortunately, at that time, Delaware did not have such a law and so he wasn’t charged with the 2 murders. My friend worked very hard to get such a law enacted in Delaware and she succeeded before the Peterson law was signed by Pres. Bush.


13 posted on 10/17/2009 1:07:15 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
if the woman wanted the baby, then it’s a baby, and killing it is murder. If she doesn’t, then it’s not a baby, and killing it is a “reproductive choice”.

B-bb-bbb-but what if she changes her mind at the last moment and wants it 'aborted'?? Then what ???

14 posted on 10/17/2009 1:09:55 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

They only acknowledge the unborn when they are charging someone with murder. Hmmm, I could never quite figure that out....


15 posted on 10/17/2009 1:25:29 PM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Audit the FED NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
That’s the Lacy Peterson law whatever the name is. Remember it was signed into law under Bush when Scott Peterson killed Lacy with her pregnant?

I didn't know there was a federal murder statute. Usually the Fed's get the vapors about someones "civil rights" and surely murder deprives a person of his civil rights. If they've added murder to the list of Federal crimes it's more evidence of Federalization creeping into what historically has been a State function. If the States don't push back and soon they will wake up one morning and find they have been "Federalized" out of business.

Regards,
GtG

16 posted on 10/17/2009 1:26:57 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
Memo to State Governors,

All your tax revenues are belong to US!

signed,
BBMFIC
The Obama Man Can!

17 posted on 10/17/2009 1:30:42 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

So anyone except the mother and abortion doctor can be charged with the murder of a “fetus”? Sounds like a violation of the 14th amendment.


18 posted on 10/17/2009 1:33:03 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1111.html U.S. Code collection The penalities for murder are different in each state but murder is illegal in all states? This just adds the unborn to the charge of murder.

I hear you on states soverignty. Maybe the states could have appealled the decision.

19 posted on 10/17/2009 1:57:28 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

If the Nazi Pelochio VAT tax passes, states are doomed.


20 posted on 10/17/2009 1:58:52 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson