Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical Murder (FULL TEXT)
Whistleblower Magazine (WorldNetDaily.com) ^ | August 2009 | Richard Poe

Posted on 10/15/2009 3:37:33 PM PDT by Richard Poe

Reprinted from WorldNetDaily's Whistleblower Magazine, August 2009

TODAY WE CALL IT OBAMACARE. In 1993, we called it Hillarycare. A more accurate name would be Rockefellercare.

Since the 1980s, America’s leading promoter of medical rationing has been Democrat Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, better known as Jay Rockefeller.

The Rockefeller clan has long sought to use medicine as an instrument of population control. Dynasty founder John D. Rockefeller, the legendary oil tycoon who created Standard Oil, poured money into eugenics projects, designed to purify the human race by preventing undesirables from breeding. The Hastings Center -- which received start-up money both from the Rockefeller Foundation and from John D. Rockefeller III personally -- pioneered “end-of-life” care as we know it today.

Healthcare Dictatorship

Jay Rockefeller has followed in his father’s footsteps. He is leading the charge for Obamacare.

As Chairman of the Senate Finance Subcommittee on Health Care, he is currently pushing a bill that will strip Congress of authority over federal health spending. Rockefeller's proposed MedPAC Reform Act of 2009 would transfer that power to a secretive committee of “experts.”

A May 20 press release from Rockefeller's office said that the new law would “reform MedPAC as an executive agency modeled after the Federal Reserve Board.”

In its current form, MedPAC merely advises Congress on Medicare spending. The new MedPAC – nicknamed “MedPAC on Steroids” – will tell Congress what to do.

AUTHOR'S NOTE: WorldNetDaily ran this story in its Whistleblower print magazine in August 2009. Now the full text is available online.

(Excerpt) Read more at richardpoe.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: obamacare
Please note that Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel -- Obama's special advisor for health policy -- is a Hastings Center fellow.
1 posted on 10/15/2009 3:37:34 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Exactly who will decide what is “desirable”? Exactly what makes these people think they are so perfect. Perhaps Hitler left behind some reference materialto help them figure it out. Shameful.


2 posted on 10/15/2009 3:46:08 PM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Kill all of the bills. They have nothing at all to do with health care. Stop kidding yourselves, people. This is a communist coup attempt.

Health Care Reform (HCR) is a direct assault on individual liberties. I think that is its main purpose.

HCR is not just about rationing and wealth redistribution. It's about the end of all individual rights as the corrosive effects of the new collectivist basic human right to health care spreads throughout the legal and political system like a virus.

Congressman Anthony Weiner says that health care is not a commodity. If health care is not a commodity then doctors and nurses are not free and sovereign citizens. If health care is a right then health care workers are slaves to that right who must serve it. No health care worker could refuse to provide their services, for any reason, because that would violate the patient's basic human right to health care.

That means that health care providers have no individual rights. The collective right of the people to receive health care would supersede the provider's individual right to set their fees, their hours or change their occupational status or even decide how to apply their skills and knowledge. A collective right, by practical definition, is a state right because it is a right that is provided by the government to all not protected by the government as something possessed by each person. It is also a state right because it supersedes the individual rights of others when the two come into conflict.

It isn't stated in any of the bills that a patient's rights to care supersedes a provider's right to set fees and hours etc, but it doesn't need to. Rights are always adjudicated in the courts. The legislation simply establishes the foundation for the courts to rule in favor of the patient's collective right to health care.

Weiner’s view is collectivist, fascist and totalitarian. Collectivist because it is superior to an individual right. Fascist because it is overseen by one entity the Federal government. Totalitarian because the Federal government is the true possessor of this collective right and the administrator and enforcer of it as well.

Congressman Weiner's view is the underlying philosophy of the entire Health Care Reform legislation the House and Senate have put forth. Consider the setting up of community watch dogs to monitor various health parameters of citizens in the Senate version of the bill. Look at pages 382 - 393.

TITLE I—QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AMERICANS

Even the citizens themselves will be subject to state set regulations on their behavior in order to fulfill the human right of universal health care. It isn't the individual's liberty that is being protected by that it is the state's control over its health care system that is being guarded. How much clearer can it be that these bills abrogate the concept of individual rights?

Health Care is a Liberty Issue
Conservative Underground - 18 August 2009 - Tim Dunkin

Another Stupid Argument: Heath Care is a Right

Involuntary Medical Servitude

Obama's Authoritarian, Unconstitutional Health Care Proposal

Defining A Right In America

To Americans Who Believe Healthcare is a Right

Second Bill of Rights aka FDR's economic bill of rights
(An early attempt to embed collective rights into American politics and society.)

3 posted on 10/15/2009 3:48:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Everybody knows it's a spotted dog...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
From Hastings' site:

"Much of the Center’s research addresses bioethics issues in three broad areas: care and decision making at the end of life, public health priorities, and new and emerging technologies."

4 posted on 10/15/2009 3:51:07 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Since its founding in 1969, “The activities of the [Hastings] Center” included research into “death and dying, behavior control, genetic engineering and counseling, and population control,” according to bioethicist Albert R. Jonsen, writing in his book The Birth of Bioethics.
5 posted on 10/15/2009 4:13:02 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

These people are monsters.


6 posted on 10/15/2009 4:50:34 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It is interesting that the same people who are so avid for population control through abortions and birth control and denial of medical services also seem to be avid for something like unlimited immigration, excepting white Europeans. Margaret Sanger, the Mother of Eugenics for weeding out “inferior” types of humans has been stood on her head. The purpose now is to weed out the most successful varieties of humanity, except, I guess, among the Ruling Class but the RC is weeding itself out by not breeding.


7 posted on 10/15/2009 5:01:31 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Forced devolution? That brings some logical sense to the love of Mao and Che that seems so ubiquitous in 0bama’s circle.


8 posted on 10/15/2009 5:41:57 PM PDT by TigersEye (Everybody knows it's a spotted dog...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
These people are monsters...

...out to kill us all, it seems. If they can't do it one way, they will another. They want their perfect world...with only themselves in it.

When the Rapture happens, they may well get their wish.

9 posted on 10/15/2009 7:39:11 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Note: this topic is from October 15, 2009. Thanks go to Richard Poe.
Today We Call It Obamacare. In 1993, we called it Hillarycare. A more accurate name would be Rockefellercare.

10 posted on 12/04/2009 5:24:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

Note: this topic is from October 15, 2009. Again, thanks go to Richard Poe [original]. I pinged this seven months ago. Oh, there are fewer than five months to go to Christmas.
11 posted on 07/26/2010 4:49:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson