What is reckless, you damn criminal traitor in black robe?
Here is an exparte meeting to take over America recklessly violating the Judicial Code of Conduct.
Posted on 10/14/2009 1:42:54 PM PDT by steve-b
Federal District Judge Clay D. Land has slapped top birther Orly Taitz with a $20,000 fine for wasting the court's time, among other issues, with her constant filings after he, last month, dismissed her lawsuit against President Obama's right as commander-in-chief to deploy the military because he allegedly isn't legally president.
Because he didn't get rid of her the first time, he's hoping she gets the message this time from the barbed language in the 43-page order he issued Tuesday.
Right off the bat, on page 1 he writes:
For justice to be administered efficiently and justly, lawyers must understand the conditions that goven their privilege to practice law. Lawyers who do not understand those conditions are at best woefully unprepared to practice the profession and at worst a menace to it...Among Taitz's missteps, she accused the judge of treason. That never works out well.......When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge's rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice...
...Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct....
(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...
I figured out she’s a bit nuts a while ago. Her court filings were worse than pro se filings, and had a bit of the lunatic ravings you often see in them. She almost reminded me of Jack Thompson (disbarred for his rants, among other things).
She was not the right person to be representing this case.
Nina Totenberg : “I think [Helms] ought to be worried about the — about what’s going on in the good Lord’s mind because if there’s retributive justice, he’ll get AIDS from a transfusion or one of his grandchildren will get it.” (July 8, 1995 episode of Inside Washington)
You forgot the l.
;)
Orley is a comedic genius.
Nope by Pres. Bush but........
Orly Taitz is far more reasonable than the marxist chumps at NPR. LOL
>>“Call me slow, but I’m beginning to think Orly’s a little coo coo. :`)
>
>A little? The woman is bats**t crazy.
In a country where laws are put into law without being read the woman is absolutely sane. {ie her “crazy” is FAR more reasonable AND defensible than the actions we’re getting from our government leadership.}
Odd that they couldn’t find this kind of judge in Alaska when the wackos up there were filing frivalous lawsuit after lawsuit against Sarah Palin.
And for those of you who are saying that Orley Taitz is nuts; you seem to be willfully neglecting the point that Obama could have made this all go away with a simple REAL birth certificate. The certificate he presented was not a birth certificate. My ex-wife had one of those from MA and when she tried to get her Concealed Carry license in New Mexico, they told her that they couldn’t use that and that they needed a REAL birth certificate. Instead Obama spends millions of someone’s money fighting it. Odd ...
Judge Land was a conservative Republican on the GA state legislature before being appointed to the federal bench by Pres. Bush (43). The judge in CA on whom everyone is hanging their hopes was, in fact, appointed by Clinton.
No lawyer can file the types of documents Dr. Taitz did in Judge Land’s court and not expect a severe sanction. As did you in your post, she accused Judge Land of colluding with “Obama’s goons,” i.e., AG Holder, because, supposedly, someone who looked like Holder was seen in a coffee shop across the street from the court on the day of the hearing. That may be OK to post at an online website, it is NOT ok to file in a federal court. Oh, and she went on to accuse thejudge of treason, and of being biased because he personally owns shares of 2 of America’s largest corporations.
There is just absolutely no excuse for a lawyer to do that, especially after being warned. She blew it big time.
"All this" is a bunch of nut cases making all of Obama's critics look like nut cases by association. Why on Earth would he want that to ever go away?
Land was a conservative Republican State Senator who was appointed a judge by George W. Bush on the recommendation of Sheby Chambliss.
Land's decision was based not on any love for Obama, but on his disgust with Orly Taitz's wacky litigation style, and on his view (well-based in precedent) that civilian courts have no jurisdiction to review military orders. (The case was seeking to overturn the Army's order to an officer to deploy to Iraq. There is a ton of precedent that says that civilian courts can't overturn such orders.)
Fidel Castro could be nominated, and placed on ballots.. ( With thousands upon thousands of citizens screaming at their government officials the entire time to check his credentials).
Citizens ( products of our Marxist dominated government schools) could elect Fidel Castro. ( With constitutionally grounded citizens by the hundreds of thousands **vigorously** complaining to their elected officials and begging at their so-called “conservative” talk show weenies them to cover the issue.)
The Electoral College could vote for Fidel Castro for U.S. President. ( Again with thousands of citizen writing, faxing and calling in to object.).
Attorney Berg might even get Fidel's case all the way to the Supreme Court. ( With a minimum of 250,000 FedEX letters arriving begging the Supreme court to hear the case.)
The Congress could approve him.( With thousands of citizens writing, calling, and faxing in objection.)
And...Citizens have “no standing” to go to court and ask that our Constitution be upheld, and Fidel Castro’s natural born status examined.
Somehow, I don't think this is what our Founding Fathers had in mind.
Here is my conspiracy theory....
Obama wont show his birth certificate because birthers like Orly end up making the whole movement look like idiots. Why would he want this to stop?
Bingo!
What is reckless, you damn criminal traitor in black robe?
Here is an exparte meeting to take over America recklessly violating the Judicial Code of Conduct.
You do see Justices Roberts and Thomas in that picture, right? And, I'm quite sure that Alito and Scalia are in the room as well.
Is the Chief Justice also "violating the Judicial Code" when he swears in the VP or President? How about when they attend the State of the Union address?
This happens a lot. A series, even hugh, issue arises and we support the nut clusters. Demonrats win because our dentist/lawyer/constitutional scholar gets 15 minutes of wacko fame.
What do you get when you cross an Orly with a Paul? A pOrly Ron party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.