[JimSEA]

I don't see anything on U. S. inspections of Russian sites. It must be there somewhere, no one could be this stupid without at least the cover of Russian promises of our inspections of their sites. Would they??

[C210N]

No, they wouldn't be THAT stupid. I presume they wouldn't be stupid enough to allow Iran to inspect US Nuke sites.

Or... Would they?

[GeronL]

Yes we can be that stupid. We scrapped plans for missile defense in Europe and asked for nothing in return didn’t we?

Russia is playing us like a drum.

[Tenacious 1]

Last I checked there are still no give on sanctions for Iran and I missed the part where we were inspecting their military might.

Some of the story must have gotten cut off. There was nothing in there about the quid pro quo. A negotiation is generally about an exchange of something. What did our great leader get for us in return for our showing our privates.

[mapmaker77]

You know, there for a while I was thinking that Hillary was smarter than this, but I was wrong. She is going along with this farce with eyes wide open. We are going to wake up one day soon surrounded, disarmed and defenseless.

[puppypusher]

If there is reciprocity in the inspection protocol,I have NO problems with the agreement.

[Ben Mugged]

The Russians have been inspecting Vandenberg AFB since the early 1970s as a result of the SALT Treaty. I know the inspections are reciprocal but I don't know which Russian sites we inspect.

This is not a new concept......

[blondee123]

Holy CRAP, what next!!!

[Lucky9teen]

This is yet another WTF story...

[ßuddaßudd]

U F B

[bustinchops]

This is just beyond the pale.

[autumnraine]

How can anyone not think Obama is deliberately destroying America?

What is it going to take???

[JSDude1]

Kidding, right..?

[DaveTesla]

“We want to ensure that every question that the Russian military or Russian government asks is answered,” she said, calling missile defense “another area for deep cooperation between ourcountries.”

On another critical issue, Lavrov declared that it would be counterproductive to threaten Iran with more sanctions over its nuclear program — as he resisted efforts by Clinton to win agreement for tougher measures should Iran fail to prove its program is peaceful.

Clinton visited Moscow on her first trip since becoming America’s top diplomat, in an effort to gauge Moscow’s willingness to join the U.S. in imposing sanctions.

Clinton said the U.S. agreed it was important to pursue diplomacy with Iran.

“At the same time that we are very vigorously pursuing this track, we are aware that we might not be as successful as we need to be, so we have always looked at the potential of sanctions in the event we are not successful and cannot assure ourselves . . .

[NonValueAdded]

Oh great, we're going to show them "the Big Board" and not even get a reach-around in return.

Hillary opens the kimono - wrong on every level!

[grey_whiskers]

WTF? I thought it was Iran which had the rogue nuclear program.

Cheers!

[Revel]

I read this story yesterday. Is this the first if was posted on FR?

[RasterMaster]

Russia reserves pre-emptive nuclear strike right

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2362713/posts

[rdl6989]

Comrade Ubama: The gift that keeps on giving.

[DoughtyOne]

Well JimSEA, did Obama get quid pro quo for canceling the defensive missile shield around Poland? About all I can see that he got was a declaration by Putin, that a first strike was still on the table if he was having a bad day.

So do I have confidence that Obama got us an on-site inspection too? Ah... no...

What’s more, will Putin’s crew have a GPS with them? Are they going to document the exact coordinates of our remaining nukes?

Honestly, I have no confidence with this administration whatsoever.

[Marine_Uncle]

As far as I am concern the shit has hit the proverbial fan.
Zero's team have far beyond reasonable argument moved beyond the limits of "safe diplomacy".
This clown and his handlers are either to naive in effect due to their long term indoctrinations in liberal wishy washy world views etc., put this Republic and really all our allies in a precarious situation, AND OR, it really is what many of us have preached about... the deliberate course to undermine this Republic's sovereignty and well being, and in essence safety. There is such little room to make excuses as to a possible naive attempt at making the world feel warm and cozy. One does not do that as a responsible leader of the free world.
If one produces the hard to defend argument that the Ruskie now feel un-secure if the Iranian supreme leader kicked the bucket, I would respond .... BS. Russia wants to do what it wants to do on the world stage. And they have a huge armory of nuclear weapons. So do we. But we have not ever suggested we would use them in a pre-emp fashion as far as I can see. in recent years. They play dangerous games. But ones they feel they can totally get away with now that the socialist is in power in the west.