Skip to comments.
Tentative Inspection Program Would Allow Russia to Visit U.S. Nuclear Sites
Fox News ^
| October 13, 2009
| Fox News
Posted on 10/13/2009 10:42:13 AM PDT by JimSEA
Russia and the United States have tentatively agreed to a weapons inspection program that would allow Russians to visit nuclear sites in America to count missiles and warheads.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhofascism; bhotreason; breaking; clinton; democrats; nuclear; obama; omg; reddawn; reddawnii; russia; surrender; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
I don't see anything on U. S. inspections of Russian sites. It must be there somewhere, no one could be this stupid without at least the cover of Russian promises of our inspections of their sites. Would they??
1
posted on
10/13/2009 10:42:14 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: JimSEA
No, they wouldn't be THAT stupid. I presume they wouldn't be stupid enough to allow Iran to inspect US Nuke sites.
Or... Would they?
2
posted on
10/13/2009 10:44:48 AM PDT
by
C210N
(A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
To: JimSEA
Yes we can be that stupid. We scrapped plans for missile defense in Europe and asked for nothing in return didn’t we?
Russia is playing us like a drum.
3
posted on
10/13/2009 10:45:39 AM PDT
by
GeronL
("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
To: GeronL
Well, they have do have a man on the inside.
4
posted on
10/13/2009 10:48:25 AM PDT
by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: JimSEA
Last I checked there are still no give on sanctions for Iran and I missed the part where we were inspecting their military might.
Some of the story must have gotten cut off. There was nothing in there about the quid pro quo. A negotiation is generally about an exchange of something. What did our great leader get for us in return for our showing our privates.
5
posted on
10/13/2009 10:49:43 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
To: JimSEA
You know, there for a while I was thinking that Hillary was smarter than this, but I was wrong. She is going along with this farce with eyes wide open. We are going to wake up one day soon surrounded, disarmed and defenseless.
To: JimSEA
If there is reciprocity in the inspection protocol,I have NO problems with the agreement.
7
posted on
10/13/2009 10:52:40 AM PDT
by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the Dogs.)
To: C210N
Unfortunately, this isn’t new or even Democrat stupidity. We invited senior Chinese military officials to the Pentagon, basically gave them the keys to the kingdom and got nothing in return. Oh, sorry - at the unclassified level (for my buddies on the MI Ping List) they got lots of illegal inside information on our latest weapons systems (JTF and F-22) by cyber-espionage from China WHILE their senior officials were visiting the Pentagon.
We’ve been played for fools in four consecutive administrations, and it’s sickening.
Colonel, USAFR
8
posted on
10/13/2009 10:55:50 AM PDT
by
jagusafr
(Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
To: puppypusher
we operate observation posts in Russia - every so oftem I see ad on Dice for EE’s who can deploy for 3 years and live
on an isolated post. whether they are for missile launch verification or nuclear material verification is unknown.
9
posted on
10/13/2009 10:56:27 AM PDT
by
rahbert
To: mapmaker77
"there for a while I was thinking that Hillary was smarter than this"
Why? What possible reason would you have to think that, other than random hope?
10
posted on
10/13/2009 10:59:35 AM PDT
by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: JimSEA
The Russians have been inspecting Vandenberg AFB since the early 1970s as a result of the SALT Treaty. I know the inspections are reciprocal but I don't know which Russian sites we inspect.
This is not a new concept......
11
posted on
10/13/2009 10:59:41 AM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
To: JimSEA
12
posted on
10/13/2009 11:04:07 AM PDT
by
blondee123
(Welcome to life under Obama Bin Lyin!)
To: JimSEA
This is yet another WTF story...
13
posted on
10/13/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(America is at that awkward stage..2 late 2 work within the system, but 2 early 2 shoot the bastards)
To: Ben Mugged
Even is the inspections are reciprocal, which may be the case, there is no indication as to what the Russians have given up in exchange for this “deepening” of penetration in America. Also, any agreement with Russia alone ignores the very real problems in China and the emerging nuclear powers. These are not new objections either.
14
posted on
10/13/2009 11:18:57 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: JimSEA
15
posted on
10/13/2009 11:26:08 AM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
To: JimSEA
This is just beyond the pale.
16
posted on
10/13/2009 11:28:49 AM PDT
by
bustinchops
(Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
To: JimSEA
How can anyone not think Obama is deliberately destroying America?
What is it going to take???
17
posted on
10/13/2009 11:41:18 AM PDT
by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: jagusafr
Rhetorical question - When does this get to the point where it is considered treason? Who decides when the line has been crossed that an administration is working with the enemy to undermine our national security? (I mean beyond just our opinion as conservatives, - to the point where serious steps must be taken?)
18
posted on
10/13/2009 11:57:36 AM PDT
by
boxlunch
To: boxlunch
It’s far past that point now.
19
posted on
10/13/2009 12:10:09 PM PDT
by
darkangel82
(I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
To: JimSEA
20
posted on
10/13/2009 12:18:57 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson