Posted on 10/12/2009 3:57:32 AM PDT by Tzvi INN.com
Mohammed Dahlan, the former Fatah leader in Gaza and a senior PA legislator, told Israeli Radio listeners Sunday that a Jewish presence in eastern Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria is equivalent to Arab terrorist suicide bombings. "What is the difference between blowing up a bus in Tel Aviv and taking over Palestinian land?" he asked rhetorically.
Dahlan also warned Israel that violent riots in the capital will continue as long as Jews visit the Temple Mount, which was re-opened to Jews on Sunday.
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
Targeted assassination of advocate of violence, murder and war.
Or, if says this is a mob, direct popular action. Then kill the violent actors as a mob.
People, singular or in groups are the problem. No person, no problem.
1) There's no such thing as "Palestine" to begin with.
2) Most of the land you call "Palestinian" you lost in a bloody Blitzkrieg called the Seven Day War that Arabs started because you took on little old Israel because you thought you could roll right over, got your a$$e$ handed to you by the power of God, and then whined for decades about not getting back.
3) When really naive Israeli leaders offered you almost all of the occupied lands back, over and over, time and again, your towel-headed, lice ridden, AIDS infested leader thought the deal wasn't sweet enough, and just continued to sock away billions in American aid into his Swiss bank accounts. Or have you ever considered that if you had that land back, you might have decided you didn't really need Arafat, and he didn't want to be out of a really easy, profitable job?
4) When actually given huge tracts of land in a futile search for peace, your stupid short-sighted militants went right back to blowing up Israeli pizza parlors anyway, because any idiot can see you don't want peace and never will...you just want justification to kill JOOOOOOOOOOOOOSE!
5) Those very JOOOOOOOOSE in four generations did more with your desert wasteland than you did in two thousand years. Through commerce and industry, they became food exporters in a rich fertile land, because their plan for the land went beyond squabbling and killing people because of what happened a thousand years ago. You? When given land from Israel in a STUPID attempt to buy you off, your sand-dwelling tribal morons actually smashed perfectly good, perfectly run, producing greenhouses that could have fed your people if even badly operated, all because they once belonged to JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSE! You would rather starve than make peace, which is all I need to know.
So the Moslems are using moral equivalence the way American liberals do. Is it possible that there are people who actually believe that Israeli settlements are the same as terrorist bombings? With such irrational thought on display, is it any wonder that peace cannot be established in the Middle East?
NO MUSLIMS, NO TERROR!!
Islam, destroyers of civilizations.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Gee whiz, gosh golly. I just can’t think of a difference...um...Jews in Judah and Shomron develop the country, create jobs and wealth, while blowing up a bus simply kills people and ruins a perfectly good bus? Nah. Can’t be. Give me time. I’m thinking...
“Those very JOOOOOOOOSE in four generations did more with your desert wasteland than you did in two thousand years.”
They haven’t been here for two thousand years. For most of those two millenia, Jooos have been present, albeit not as copiously as we are right now, but Arabs have been here for only a small portion of that time, also not as copiously as they are at present.
“What is the difference between blowing up a bus in Tel Aviv and taking over Palestinian land?”
How does he allege that this land became “Palestinian land”? Specifically, is he of the opinion that Hebron became “Palestinian” by committing mass murder in 1929, and Gush Etzion through several massacres of Jooos in 1947-8? And if that is what he believes it takes to acquire ethnic title to a land, does he suggest that the Jooos reciprocate with multiple massacres of Arabs, and that otherwise our right to live in Judah and Shomron won’t be respected?
He puts a rather low premium on his own people’s lives. The Jooos won Judah and Shomron by fighting humanely but effectively in 1967, and have held it since while exercising epic restraint despite enormous provocation, and as a result, he contests our right to even live here.
Hell. The Arabs were not making any constructive use of it anyway.
But perhaps this is what Musashi Miyamoto meant when he said that when you defeat a man physically, you must still hit him several more times, until he gives up the idea of fighting you.
Alright, point taken. And I stand by the other four.
Also worth noting that there were plenty of jobs for Arabs in Israel...until they had to close the borders...because of Arabs killing Jews.
Even so, there are plenty of jobs for Arabs. Every time I pass a construction site, guess which language the foreman and workers are speaking. And the machinery stays idle every Friday, even in the morning, because it’s the Islamic Sabbath. A “settlement freeze” would be much to the liking of the muckety mucks in power in Ramallah, but for Arab construction workers, it would mean layoffs.
The “borders” aren’t really closed, for that matter. They just have to walk through the gate under the watchful eye of IDF troops, who can spot someone with a large bulk under his shirt, or a nervous demeanor, or both, and then move in to investigate, just like any highway patrolman in the states approaching a possible DUI. Everybody else can just go about their business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.