Posted on 10/07/2009 3:47:21 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
Not only is Fox News Contributor Marc Lamont Hill an admirer of convicted cop killer and radical Icon Mumia Abu-Jamal, he's also his publisher. AIM's Cliff Kincaid discovered that Abu-Jamal has been promoted on Hill's now-deleted myspace site; but it goes even further. For two years, I read Hill's blog daily. His views are indeed radical. He frequently praised Castro and Khallid Muhammed, along with other criminals and dictators. Here's Abu-Jamal's warm introduction by Hill: "I am thrilled to announce that Mumia Abu-Jamal has joined the Barbershop as a weekly contributor!! His column, 'Live from Death Row', will appear every Wednesday. Mumia is one of the world's most celebrated journalists, freedom fighters, and political prisoners. From the time of his involvement with the Black Panther Party, Mamu has devoted his life to Black Liberation." Hill needs to be held accountable. And who better to do it than the enabler of Hill's commentary, Mr. No Spin Zone himself? Click here to e-mail Bill O'Reilly...
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
Fox needs to dump him. I won’t watch him, and I’ve had it with BOR, too.
FRY MUMIA
OR never does his homework. He has no command of facts or details, and his leftist butt kissing reviles me. We rarely watch him anymore. We DVR his show and a bunch of others to give Fox the ratings. But we delete OR and Shep without watching.
OR brags about what tough interviews he does, but I could have done a better job at the age of 30 than he does now at his age and with all his time in the media.
Because he is pre-emptive fairness doctrine.
ED Hill got fired for saying Obama did a terrorist fist bump, which he did.
He don’t eat no cracker ass jacks.
This is what makes it fair and balanced.
Capital letters and punctuation marks are your friends.
always liked E.D. Hill, shame she went but hopefully she gets back at some time.
He offers absolutely no insightful thoughts whatsoever......each and every time.
To think he gets $65,000 (so I heard) as a Foxnews commentator is absolutely pathetic.
I turn off hsep so as not to give him ratings.
As for OR
I went off him when he was butt kissing bozo for an interview before the election.
Every now and again I turn over to see what he is doing and everytime I see him say that we should give bozo the benefit of the doubt/
Lately I saw him telling ROve he was wrong and the way he did it was backing up what you said.
No grasp of facts and clearly up bozo’s arse
I didn’t even know that until now!
Pathetic.
I think that if someone is looking for the far left opinion to be represented, Hill is about right for that job. Surprisingly enough, he isn’t a czar yet. I don’t have a problem with hearing what he has to say, as opposed to just trying to guess what the left is thinking. Knowlege is power.
You’re right about that. O’Reilly is a classic windbag. And he’s a rude windbag. Have you noticed Bill’s method of “discussion”? - get loud, overtalk, interrupt every four words and pretend he knew all that anyway!
Fry Mumia
Good point. What’s even worse than giving this hate-America, neo-Marxist air time is presenting him as somone whose opinions are worthy of consideration. In that regard, both O’Reilly and Hill are frauds who try to deceive the viewing audience.
Post worth a thousand words! O’Reilly and Hill should conduct a seminar on how many whites and Asians are excluded from colleges just to admit affirmative action fakers like Hill. By the way, not very long ago no self-respecting university would confer a Ph.d. in education. It was always Ed.D., or some such thing.
It this a suprise!?
The only reason we help with the ratings is because, much as we’re sick of OR, we despise MSNBC, CNN, NBC, etc., even more - a lot more.
I cannot even begin to think that OR telling Rove what’s what could be anything but either nauseating or comical. If he aid that to Rove, Rove should just be unavailable next time OR invites him on.
My husband and I got totally sick of OR inviting somebody very knowledgeable about a particular subject or event on and then lecturing them from his standpoint of almost total ignorance on the subject.
I agree. O’Reilly doesn’t do any serious questioning but takes a bogus figure like 75,000 and even after that number has been totally discredited runs with it like it’s fact. You’re right about the signs. He pointed out a few signs out of a million others because they were inflammatory and NOT typical. Keith Olbermann couldn’t have done a better job of misrepresentation!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.