When the perp is a Republican.
The entire Left/Commie/Democatic/Lib establishment flushed itself with Clinton. Up until then, I could at least maintain the fiction that there were a handful of thinking, breathing, moral people on the other side, even if I disagreed with them on political issues. But when all but one of the NOW chapters defended Bill Clinton, the serial rapist who "kept abortion legal" I decided that I really was right...there are no real morals on the other side.
NOW always argued that rape was so serious that a woman would never lie about it, that the man was ALWAYS guilty if a woman cried "rape"! They supposedly believed that Anita Hill was opressed (when the person accused was a conservative.) They rushed to the defense of every woman who claimed to be even looked at funny by a man, and mandated silly, demeaning "sensitivity classes" for those (read "all men") they judged guilty.
Under NOW's draconian watch, even paying a compliment to a woman was banished. And yet, when it was Bill Clinton, the "charming bastard" who used his political power over an impressionable girl, who cheated on his wife, who lied under oath, who defiled the Oval Office, who made us a laughing stock in the eyes of the world...when it was Bill, NOW's memebers fluttered their blind eyes like foorlish schoolgirls, and rolled over like a two-dollar-a-go Yokohama whore.
"Rape-rape" surely is what you get if a televangelist, or a Republican, or a racist oppoenant of the President does it. Clearly, if a Democrat/Liberal does it, it's not as serious or as truamatic for the woman.
This is what I despise about the other side. At least if there were one set of rules I could respect them for believing in what they claim to believe. But no, with Democrats, the rules change to give them the best outcome. That is the primary defference between the two.
This is what I despise about the other side. At least if there were one set of rules I could respect them for believing in what they claim to believe. But no, with Democrats, the rules change to give them the best outcome. That is the primary defference between the two.
++++++++++++++
Exactly. Whatever the liberals and Democrats talk about is an illusion. Because they shift the rules, morals and definitions of things at their own whim.
We’ve even seen this with the Constitution and with activist judges (certainly). Why not with pop culture.
You cannot trust liberals, nor what they say. You certainly cannot trust liberal promises of ‘centrism’ which is why we were SO DISGUSTED with the Obama worship and with RINOs nuzzling up to the liberal lies, for some moment of recognition on the Formerly MSM.