[thecraw]

Think of it this way (if you can): Under the laws of nature, every child born requires no act of law to establish the fact the child inherits through nature his/her father’s citizenship as well as his name (or even his property) through birth. This law of nature is also recognized by the Law of Nations. Birth outside of US soil would require an act of law to confer citizenship to that child.

The Founding Fathers understood natural law, so why is it so hard for you Obots? Remember his father was a Kenyan national? Even if he was born in Hawaii he would not qualify under natural law.

[mlo]

Nonsense.

[Clemenza]

Even if he was born in Hawaii he would not qualify under natural law.

Over 100 years of legal precedent since the 13th and 14th have effectively conferred citizenship on ANYONE born in our borders (ie birthright citizenship). Why do you think that even the children of illegals born here have citizenship, as they have for several decades?

Whatever you think about "original intent" is irrelevant in the face of existing legal opinion.