Skip to comments.
Melting memory chips in mass production - Phase-change memory's 40-year journey from...
Nature News ^
| 25 September 2009
| Geoff Brumfiel
Posted on 09/28/2009 10:01:49 AM PDT by neverdem
Phase-change memory's 40-year journey from bright idea to mobile phone.
Is phase-change memory about to appear in your mobile phone?Samsung
South Korean manufacturer Samsung Electronics announced this week that it has begun mass production of a new kind of memory chip that stores information by melting and freezing tiny crystals. Known as phase-change memory (PCM), the idea was first proposed by physicists in the 1960s. Here, Nature explains how PCM works, why it has taken so long to develop and how it could change your mobile phone forever.
What's the big idea behind PCM?
PCM was first proposed by physicist and inventor Stanford Ovshinsky in 19681. It rests on a simple concept: atoms that are neatly arranged in crystals conduct electrons better than those jumbled up in a glass. Using the crystal form as a binary '1' and the glass form as '0' it is possible to store electronic information in a crystalline cell. Many such cells, Ovshinsky reasoned, could be used to create computer memory.
Unlike conventional memory, which involves moving electrons around a chip, PCM data would literally be frozen in place, even when the machine is off. That means these devices could switch on nearly instantaneously.
So why haven't PCM chips been available before?
PCM is simple in principle, but it is much harder to implement, says Matthias Wuttig, a physicist at RWTH Aachen University in Germany. The main problem is with writing the information into the material. To write in a one or a zero, the crystalline material has to be heated to high temperatures and refrozen, either in a crystal or glassy form. In the 1960s, most of the materials that physicists tried for PCM required high currents and temperatures to crystallize.
What was the big breakthrough?
In the 1970s and 1980s, scientists developed new classes of crystalline materials in which the atoms were held together by very weak bonds. As a result, the materials could shift from crystal to glass very quickly.
But turning that breakthrough into a working device was not easy. "At the time, the industry was still exploring basic transistors," says Gregory Atwood, a senior fellow at Numonyx Memory Solutions in Rolle, Switzerland, another company that produces PCM memory. As a result, other kinds of transistor-based memory, such as the flash memory currently installed in most mobile phones and mp3 players, were closer to the market. The crystalline materials, notably germanium antimony telluride (Ge2Sb2Te5), were instead used to develop read-write optical discs, and they are still used in these discs today.
So why is PCM becoming more popular now?
Flash memory, and other solid-state memory, stores information as small regions of charge effectively a little cluster of electrons on a transistor. As the size of devices shrinks further, fewer and fewer electrons can fit, making flash and similar memories less stable at very tiny scales. At transistor sizes of a few tens of nanometres, Wuttig says that a quantum mechanical phenomenon called 'tunnelling' begins to come into play. Tunnelling allows electrons to leak out of the transistor, effectively destroying the memory. Because PCM memory doesn't rely on charge, it can theoretically be used to create ever smaller devices.
In fact, because the speed of PCM memory depends on how long it takes to melt and refreeze the crystal, the smaller each crystal cell in the device, the faster it becomes. Wuttig's group has recently conducted experiments with cells just 20 nanometres across. These cells can be switched in just 16 nanoseconds far faster than existing technology2.
Proponents hope that PCM could eventually take a substantial share of the flash memory market, worth more than $20 billion in 2008.
When will these memory chips start appearing in my mobile phone?
Very soon. Numonyx began mass-producing 128-megabyte (MB) PCM memory in December 2008. Although the chips are useable, they are still less powerful than the current generation of flash, and Atwood says that he thinks they will be used largely to build new prototype servers, cell phones and digital video recorders. Samsung's memory chip is 512MB, but that is still smaller than the current generation of flash memory.
However, the technology is developing quickly, and given the advantages of PCM and the increasing difficulties of shrinking flash, Atwood says that he thinks crystal memory will become commonplace in just a few years. "We believe it is the next generation," he says.
-
References
- Ovshinsky, S. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1450-1453 (1968). | Article | ISI
- Bruns, G. et al. App. Phys. Lett. 95, 043108 (2009). | Article | ChemPort |
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: pcm; phasechangememory; physics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
09/28/2009 10:01:50 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Interesting! What ever happened to “bubble Memory?”
To: neverdem
Does this mean I can turn my next computer on and use it right away?
Does this mean my phone that takes 40 seconds to boot will be usable right away just like the first cell phone I had years ago?
To: neverdem
So how fast can it bring up a now 21.5GB folder full of music?
4
posted on
09/28/2009 10:17:34 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
To: neverdem
Why didn’t I think of this?
5
posted on
09/28/2009 10:32:50 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: rawhide
Sure, it seems obvious now.
6
posted on
09/28/2009 10:40:09 AM PDT
by
LearnsFromMistakes
(Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
To: neverdem
I would like a 1EB sized backup drive using this technology.
Yeah, I mean Exo-bytes!
1MB = 1,000,000 Bytes
1GB = 1,000,000,000 Bytes
1TB = 1,000,000,000,000 Bytes
1PB = 1,000,000,000,000,000 Bytes
1EB = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bytes
Plenty of storage for anyone!
7
posted on
09/28/2009 10:45:55 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: neverdem; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Flash RAM was a total blessing for so many applications/products that came to be a reality. Perhaps once they perfect the processing techniques for PCM to operate equal to silicon based transistors at WCS/WCF (worst case slow worse case fast) specs we shall see a shift away from silicon based technologies where it can apply, ex. cost effectiveness and reliability.
To: neverdem; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
9
posted on
09/28/2009 11:01:34 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: GraceG
"Plenty of storage for anyone!"I don't know about you but Bill Gates and I have never needed any more than 640K . . .
10
posted on
09/28/2009 11:09:39 AM PDT
by
blues_guitarist
(Obama is a putz! One black man's opinion . . .)
To: blues_guitarist
Ha. I remember when my maintenance office was running a bunch 286 PCs networked to a Northgate 386 file-server.
During that time my M-I-L bought a Packard-Bell 386 from Montgomery Wards - with better specs than the Northgate we were running.
Impressed, I told her “wow - this is the last PC you will ever need”.
11
posted on
09/28/2009 11:26:14 AM PDT
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: neverdem
It would seem that the write speed might be a lot lower than the read time in PCM . . .
12
posted on
09/28/2009 11:40:42 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(SPENDING without representation is tyranny. To represent us you have to READ THE BILLS.)
To: neverdem
Pretty cool. I’m not even worried about the speed, since it would be simple to do massively parallel writes to overcome the slowness of individual operations.
To: jonno
LOL!
14
posted on
09/28/2009 11:56:44 AM PDT
by
blues_guitarist
(Obama is a putz! One black man's opinion . . .)
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
15
posted on
09/28/2009 12:13:12 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: Right Wing Assault
Does this mean I can turn my next computer on and use it right away?In theory, yes. In reality, by the time these reach the consumer market, Windows 15 will be the most common operating system, requiring 1.21 petabytes of memory (2.0 petabytes recommended), so Windows will STILL take 40 seconds to boot.
16
posted on
09/28/2009 12:40:24 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
To: Marine_Uncle; neverdem
What will they think of next....
But Newegg is getting ready to deliver whatever they come up with:
Newegg Files $175M IPO
Newegg finally goes public, with financial analysts expecting big things
To: Still Thinking
Windows will STILL take 40 seconds to boot.That's my Razr phone! The laptop on the dang network at work takes about 4 minutes.
My first Win 95 machine took about 45 seconds.
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
That was commercialized (and, wow, btw) to some extent in the 1970s and early 1980s. I remember a bubble memory expansion card for the Apple II, basically the same advantage (the zeroes and ones stayed put when power went off), but wound up a niche product for demanding environments, usually industrial ones. The dynamic RAM density started climbing, prices fell like crazy, and bubble memory pretty much vanished.
19
posted on
09/28/2009 3:15:06 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; neverdem
Thanks Ernest and neverdem.
20
posted on
09/28/2009 3:16:04 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson