Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kirk appointment delay denied
Boston Herald ^

Posted on 09/25/2009 11:21:38 AM PDT by daytrader

A Suffolk Superior Court judge today denied a motion by state Republicans to delay Gov. Deval Patrick’s appointment of an interim senator by 90 days.

Judge Thomas Connolly this afternoon cleared the way for Paul G. Kirk Jr. to be sworn in as an interim U.S. senator today at 3:15 p.m. in Washington, D.C.

Developing ...

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; democratcorruption; devalpatrick; ma2009; paulkirk; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2009 11:21:38 AM PDT by daytrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daytrader

Criminals...lawbreakers...felons all!!!!

Commie rat bastages.....I despise the left.


2 posted on 09/25/2009 11:24:01 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

Unbelievable.

Well, not anymore.

This country is run by criminals.


3 posted on 09/25/2009 11:26:45 AM PDT by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

Shocked...


4 posted on 09/25/2009 11:26:55 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

How can any judge really justify this is an emergency?

Good grief!


5 posted on 09/25/2009 11:26:58 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader
Senator Kirk:

6 posted on 09/25/2009 11:27:01 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader
As Howie Carr would say: "What did ya think: this place is on the level?"

In a one-party state, the party always wins.

7 posted on 09/25/2009 11:27:11 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

Would you have expected anything else? The Commonplace of Massachhhhhhhhuuuuuuusssssetsssssssssssss!


8 posted on 09/25/2009 11:27:56 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 ( I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! The "other" Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

I thought Obama said we were a nation of laws.


9 posted on 09/25/2009 11:28:40 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

That the people of Mass don’t rise up in revolt to this constant changing of the rules to keep one party power is a testament to why we see the continued election of worthless commie scum like Barney Frank, Marty Meehan, John F Fonda Keri and Ted the swimmer Kennedy.


10 posted on 09/25/2009 11:28:42 AM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

Communism isn’t pretty.


11 posted on 09/25/2009 11:28:54 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daytrader
This fails the Ex Post Facto law in our Constitution.

12 posted on 09/25/2009 11:29:04 AM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2348204/posts


13 posted on 09/25/2009 11:31:55 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I thought Obama said we were a nation of laws.

Tell me he did not say that! If so, he should win the hypocrite of the year/century award.

The United States of America no longer has an operable Constitution, nor does it conduct itself under the Rule of Law.

Laws are for the lowly peons.

14 posted on 09/25/2009 11:33:35 AM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are broken. -Benjamin Disraeli

Sounds like Obama needs to brush up on his history a bit more.
15 posted on 09/25/2009 11:35:24 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
The criminals are enabled by the self-righteous, ignorant Massholes who continue to vote them in position of power.
16 posted on 09/25/2009 11:35:44 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daytrader

As they say....elections have consequences. And when RATs win them, the consequences are usually bad.


17 posted on 09/25/2009 11:36:50 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Love my country. Hate my government./Barack Obama: An authentic "African American.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pyx

Sadly, the Constitution doesn’t apply in this case, but rather the laws of the state of Massachusetts. Then again, they don’t matter much to liberals, either.


18 posted on 09/25/2009 11:37:20 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: daytrader
Re: Kirk appointment delay denied

Oh, the humanity... The humanity!!!!!!!

If red X above, go to http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-qF6CbJo2vY/RxweFJkKcTI/AAAAAAAABKY/u9_zGVuYo34/s400/kirk+KHAN!.jpg

19 posted on 09/25/2009 11:38:27 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pyx
"This fails the Ex Post Facto law in our Constitution."

Probably not. Justice Chase, in Calder v Bull, laid out the four principles that have guided ex post facto decisions ever since. None of those four principles apply here. The law was passed, then Kirk was appointed.

Now, I'm not entirely convinced that Kirk's appointment is allowable under the new statute. I'd like to read this Superior Court judge's decision to see exactly what his reasoning is for denying plaintiff's action.

20 posted on 09/25/2009 11:45:58 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson