Posted on 09/21/2009 12:40:12 PM PDT by julieee
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines Don't Rely on Cells From Babies Killed in Abortion
Washington, DC -- A pro-life group that monitors vaccinations is pleased to report that the new H1N1 swine flu vaccines the federal government will be distributing next month do not rely on cells from babies killed in abortions. Other vaccinations have been condemned for relying on such cells to formulate the vaccines.
(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...
What are some examples of common vaccines that use these cells?
Looking for the truth. I;m having some doubts as to the total veracity of this article.
Which vaccines?
The reference I linked to give the ones that are taken from aborted fetus cells. Others are not.
Why not? I want the good stuff.
I guess they save the human embryo vaccine for Liberals.
We’ve already had h1n1 in my home. Wasn’t any worse than any other flu I can remember.
Obama, the Democrats, the media and the UN don’t want to hear you say that!
When did they start using aborted baby cells? I thought they tossed the remains?
Don’t know about the others, but due to family history I do know about Rubella. The original source of the live virus which is used was indeed an aborted baby. I believe the number was 19, meaning that the first 18 babies aborted due to maternal Rubella were NOT infected. The live virus strain thus immorally obtained has since been grown in chicken eggs. The birth defects from prenatal Rubella are horrific which is why many doctors were willing to perform illegal abortions during the Rubella epidemic of the 1960’s. Get your kids immunized and say a prayer for the children who died.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.