Posted on 09/17/2009 12:48:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
China, Russia, et al. are talking about shifting their monetary reserves out of U.S. dollars. Gold has hit $1000 per ounce, even though wholesale and retail prices exhibit a deflationary bias. The United Nations has called for a new world currency to replace the dollar. Whats going on?
All of these phenomena are early death throes of Federal Reserve notes. I balk at saying the U.S. dollar, because a dollar is still defined in law as a certain quantity of silver or gold, whereas the U.S. currency that now circulates here and around the globe consists of nothing more than scraps of paper (actually, a linen-cotton compound)a fiat currency. (Technically, Federal Reserve notes arent even money. Historically, money denoted coinage of metals prized in the commercial marketplace; therefore, only a currency redeemable in those metals is a genuine money substitutes. Federal Reserve notes are fakes, nothing more than legalized counterfeits of true money substitutes.)
Whether Federal Reserve notes survivethat is, whether they continue to retain purchasing power and function as moneyfor a few more years or a few more decades is unknowable. In fact, the Federal Reserve note could strengthen against other currencies if the powers-that-be would trigger another financial crisis like last years. (Isnt that a wretched option?) Inevitably, though, Federal Reserve notes will become worthless, just as every other fiat currency in world history eventually ends up worth nothing more than what they arelittle scraps of material.
You may hear some politicians and commentators complain about the Chinese and others as they rebel against the dollars status as the world reserve currency. You may say that the Chinese have no business stating that our government needs to stop its spendthrift, debt-bingeing ways. The fact of the matter, though, is that the Chinese have a right to speak out on these issues. After all, the Chinese are joined to us at the financial hip. They hold reserves of over two trillion Federal Reserve notes, and close to one trillion of Treasury debt.
Put yourself in their shoes: If we held that much of a foreign currency , and we could see that the government of that country was in the process of debauching that currency by having its central bank flood the financial system with newly created reserves while the governments debt was exploding as a result of reckless, runaway spending, wouldnt you worry? Wouldnt you be tempted to feel resentful and indignant?
It is vital to realize that neither the Chinese nor the Russians nor any other foreign nation has put us in this predicament. Our fiscal/monetary crisis is 100 percent homegrown. President Obamas request for Congress to raise the debt ceiling higher than 12.1 trillion Federal Reserve notes is the result of Uncle Sams undisciplined spending, not anything that foreigners have done.
The Federal Reserve note will eventually cease to function as the worlds reserve currency. The buck served as the globes monetary anchor back when it was as good as gold, but once our country embarked on the typical democratic excess of chronic deficit spending, President Nixon closed the gold window (that is, defaulted on our solemn pledge to redeem Federal Reserve notes for gold on demand) in 1971, and the long-term depreciation of the Federal Reserve note has accelerated since then.
The world could use a solid, dependable reserve currency. Many international businesses have performed brilliantly, only to be stuck with surprise losses due to fluctuations in exchange rates between currencies. Can there be such a currency?
Yes. In fact, the world had one before World War I. It was gold. Each country minted its own gold coins. The functionality of the gold coin standard was that regardless of whose portrait or which national symbol decorated the coins surface, an ounce of gold was always an ounce of gold, regardless of where in the world it ended up.
Alas, we are in no position, I fear, to return to a gold standard now. Gold is honest money, and honest money will be rejected wherever politicians engage in the fiscal folly of spending more than the revenue they collect. The rule of thumb seems to be that the worlds leaders want a reserve currency with the benefits of a gold standard, but only on the condition that the currency isnt gold!
The worst possible development at this juncture would be for the worlds governments to grant the United Nations the authority to develop its own global currency. As imperfect as is the current system of competing, depreciating, national-fiat currencies, at least individuals and businesses can seek refuge in the least bad of the lot. To eliminate those options by the imposition of a monopolistic global fiat currency would be to make financial hostages of the whole worlds population to the U.N. bureaucracy.
This brings to mind the famous statement attributed to Mayer Rothschild (1744-1812), the founder of the immensely powerful Rothschild banking family: Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who writes the laws.
To give the United Nations control over the worlds currency would mark the end of liberty. The fact that such a fearsome possibility is even being raised is the fault of our countrys political leaders. They are the ones who have brought us to this sad state of affairs.
-- Dr. Mark W. Hendrickson is an adjunct faculty member, economist, and contributing scholar with The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College.
Federal Reserve notes have been dying since 1913.
Whole ounces minted?
Gold will quoted in grams soon...
What are Euros backed with?
And when you talk about an ounce of gold in a coin, you are talking TROY ounces, not avoirdupois ounces. TROY ounces are heavier.

Let's think about how it's been done elsewhere. Freeze all savings and checking accounts and forced exchange with a time limit at some fixed rate. Oh yeah, and don't forget
The solution is neither gold nor more debt-money. What we need to do is take back the power to create debt-free money, as was granted to the government under Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. This is what Lincoln did to finance the Civil War - Greenbacks. This money was not created from debt and it circulated permanently.
No more national debt, no more income taxes, no more Federal Reserve secrecy, no more loss of sovereignty to world banks and international organizations.
“What are Euros backed with?”
Imagination.
Germans and bloviation.
Credit is the vital air of the system of modern commerce. It has done more, a thousand times, to enrich nations, than all the mines of all the world. It has excited labor, stimulated manufactures, pushed commerce over every sea, and brought every nation, every kingdom, and every small tribe, among the races of men, to be known to all the rest. It has raised armies, equipped navies, and, triumphing over the gross power of mere numbers, it has established national superiority on the foundation of intelligence, wealth, and well-directed industry. Credit is to money what money is to articles of merchandise. As hard money represents property, so credit represents hard money; and it is capable of supplying the place of money so completely, that there are writers of distinction, especially of the Scotch school, who insist that no hard money is necessary for the interests of commerce. I am not of that opinion. I do not think any government can maintain an exclusive paper system, without running to excess, and thereby causing depreciation. -- Senator DANIEL WEBSTER, remarks in the Senate in favor of continuing the charter of the Bank of the United States, March 18, 1834.
No more Federal Reserve secrecy means no more Federal Reserve practically. Who prints our money then ?
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Federal Reserve doesn’t print money now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.