Replies

To: Steelfish

$100,000 a year is NOT wealth.

3 posted on 09/16/2009 8:41:35 PM PDT by clamper1797 (If Obama were a paid Soviet agent he could not do more damage ... Sen Thomas Jordan)

To: clamper1797

wealth - wealthy

4 posted on 09/16/2009 8:42:08 PM PDT by clamper1797 (If Obama were a paid Soviet agent he could not do more damage ... Sen Thomas Jordan)

To: clamper1797

Especially in DC. You’d probably have to live in a closet with two roommates on $100k.

9 posted on 09/16/2009 8:50:51 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)

To: clamper1797

$100,000 a year is NOT wealth.

To a $30,000 a year journalist, it is. :)

12 posted on 09/16/2009 9:09:35 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)

To: clamper1797

$100,000 a year is NOT wealth.

Maybe not, but it looks good from this angle.

16 posted on 09/16/2009 9:16:33 PM PDT by ottbmare (Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Obama!)

To: clamper1797

$100,000 is not wealth? It sure as hell is if you are 25 years old!!!

19 posted on 09/16/2009 9:30:28 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 50... 49... 48...)

To: clamper1797

I’m from Loudoun County, mentioned in the article.

I don’t know what silver spoon you have, but for a single adult, $100,000 most certainly is wealth.

21 posted on 09/16/2009 9:45:07 PM PDT by AnalogReigns

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794