Skip to comments.
Sheriff's Department Responds To Sonic Device Outrage (Planting Pain-sound Devices at TownHalls)
10News ^
| 9-15-09
Posted on 09/16/2009 9:53:33 AM PDT by blueglass
The San Diego County Sheriff's Department Tuesday responded to 10News' report about a new sonic weapon known as a Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD.
The technology has been used in Iraq to control insurgents, and now it is in the sheriff's department's possession.On Monday, members of the American Civil Liberties Union spoke with 10News, and they expressed outrage that local law enforcement had the device and that they had brought it to recent town hall meetings in case things got out of hand.
Kevin Keenan, of the ACLU, said, "We think that local law enforcement shouldn't be using military style weaponry like that."
On Tuesday, Ed Musgrove of the sheriff's department told 10News the device was only being used for good, like helping search-and-rescue teams and warning residents during fires or floods.
"So, it will never be used in San Diego
(Excerpt) Read more at 10news.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: crime; donutwatch; lrad; obama; townhall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
09/16/2009 9:53:33 AM PDT
by
blueglass
To: blueglass
The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department has ALWAYS been a BUNCH of Jack Booted Thugs.
To: blueglass
Wasn't this a South Park episode?
3
posted on
09/16/2009 9:55:45 AM PDT
by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: blueglass
On Tuesday, Ed Musgrove of the sheriff's department told 10News the device was only being used for good, like helping search-and-rescue teams and warning residents during fires or floods. Then why were they deployed to townhall protests?
4
posted on
09/16/2009 9:55:51 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: US Navy Vet
I love their excuse for using it--
"On Tuesday, Ed Musgrove of the sheriff's department told 10News the device was only being used for good, like helping search-and-rescue teams and warning residents during fires or floods."
5
posted on
09/16/2009 9:56:00 AM PDT
by
blueglass
To: dirtboy
Maybe they were expecting a firestorm of liberty, or a flood of justice at the tea parties. Ha. No, actually they are planning to use them for crowd control. “THEY LIE!”
6
posted on
09/16/2009 9:57:52 AM PDT
by
blueglass
To: blueglass
the device was only being used for good, like helping search-and-rescue teams and warning residents during fires or floods. IIRC the LRAD is highly directional. It would be next to useless for both these activities.
7
posted on
09/16/2009 9:58:51 AM PDT
by
agere_contra
('We do not need a censorship of the press. We have a censorship by the press' Chesterton.)
To: blueglass
[The LRAD cost the sheriff’s department $27,000. . .]
It could cost them $27 million or more in the courts if they ever use it on a crowd.
8
posted on
09/16/2009 9:59:05 AM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: blueglass
Cops and their toys.
Just like the military, if they have the weapon, they'll use it.
9
posted on
09/16/2009 9:59:43 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Brad from Tennessee; All
This is the head man there in San Diego,
and a link to his page:

"William D. Gore assumed office as the 29th Sheriff of San Diego County on July 3, 2009. He oversees the departments 4,000 employees and an annual budget of over $579 million."
And this is how to contact him with a complaint:
■By telephone or mail to the Internal Affairs Unit - (858) 974-2065 San Diego County Sheriff's Department Internal Affairs Unit PO Box 939062 San Diego, CA 92193
To: blueglass
AHH the SDCSO and the SDPD the times change the lies remain the same.
To: dirtboy
I am wondering the same thing. I mean it’s not like we were lost or anything. LOL
12
posted on
09/16/2009 10:05:01 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: blueglass
Ed Musgrove of the sheriff's department told 10News the device was only being used for good, like helping search-and-rescue teams and warning residents during fires or floods. "So, it will never be used in San Diego" You lie!
13
posted on
09/16/2009 10:06:36 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: US Navy Vet; All
My Message to Sheriff Gore is
Hey Bill, I've got an idea, why don't you spend some of your time worrying about the flood of illegals coming through San Diego, instead of worrying about using these devices to "warn" people about floods? And one more thing- use these devices against us, and you're going to need a bigger budget."
To: blueglass
—another device (along with full-auto firearms) that has no legitimate place in domestic law enforcement—
15
posted on
09/16/2009 10:08:41 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: Travis McGee
16
posted on
09/16/2009 10:18:09 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: rellimpank
17
posted on
09/16/2009 10:26:17 AM PDT
by
Glennb51
To: blueglass
Who gave the SD police the right to interfere with a peaceful voiced disagreement at a town hall meeting. Is this gestapo Germany or what. Until the meeting becomes violent they have no jurisdiction. Do they have the right to use a weapon like this since the collateral effect would be unlawful? Just like allowing police to have fully automatic weapons. Collateral damage means nothing to the police since if it happens nothing but a possible hand slap and we taxpayers pay any civil damage to property of life.
18
posted on
09/16/2009 10:26:53 AM PDT
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: blueglass
Interesting link.
and I helped with those numbers!
19
posted on
09/16/2009 10:28:41 AM PDT
by
LasVegasMac
(Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
To: blueglass
"The technology has been used in Iraq to control insurgents..."Wait a minute, we can't shoot a gun in another room to scare one of these guys into talking but it's ok to use THIS on them?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson