You’re right, the “guy-in-the-sky”, “magic-apple”, “talking-snake” story is much more credible.
Evolution means different things to different people. Besides genetics and natural selection (which are provable), we have creation theories which is where the schism has divided the two main groups. God (The Creator) can only be believed in by faith, not science. Science may provide statistical odds of His existence but that’s all.
And those are so hard to believe, why?
You don't think there isn't life out there that is more highly advanced than humans?
Who said the apple was magic?
Why is a talking snake so improbable?
To believe in evolution is similar to believing watch parts can be placed inside a box, shaken and out comes a completed watch.
Just common sense tells us "Intelligent Design" (i.e. God as THE creator) is responsible. Add in Christ's shroud that has NEVER been duplicated, belief in God is a no brainer for anyone with a brain and an open mind.
Actually, it is (though the "magic apple" comment is not a relevant nor intelligent interpretation of the story). I find it infinitely more credible that God created the universe and ordered it according to His principles than that random organic chemicals magically turned into life from nonlife, especially as the proposed mechanisms for this abiogenesis all violate known scientific laws.
Face it - to believe in the evolutionary story of abiogenesis requires a REJECTION of actual science.
You’re right, the “guy-in-the-sky”, “magic-apple”, “talking-snake” story is much more credible.
At least an explanation is more intellectually honest than nothing at all.
Liberals thought by not having an explanation...the vacuous all just randomly occured all by itslef, and therefore couldn’t be scrutinized, while attacking everything else...
uhhhh backfired!
badly!