Posted on 09/14/2009 3:21:44 AM PDT by grundle
Regarding Charles Krauthammer's Aug. 29 column ("Obamacare 2.0: A Seductive Exit Strategy -- With a Catch"): I was pleased to see that someone finally did their research on a drug I use daily to save sight.
Lucentis injections have transformed the lives of the elderly who are unfortunate enough to have (wet) macular degeneration. We (ophthalmologists) have enthusiastically been able to help our patients maintain their independence as well as their dignity with this relatively new drug.
It is important to note that even now, according to my Genentec reps, the "Orwellian body" Mr. Krauthammer speaks of in Britain still limits these treatments to seven treatments per year per eye. In many cases this falls far short of the often-needed monthly injections in order to save and improve vision. In fact, seven per year may result in simply slowing the inevitable, allowing these frightened people to watch as their visions fades.
Mr. Obama's health-care plan limits these treatments to 14 per eye per lifetime if I read HR 3200 correctly (not an easy task). Again, this is often short of what is needed to maintain or improve vision.
I wonder if anyone in Congress would opt for this plan if they have a family history of this disease or suffer from macular degeneration themselves? Can anyone name a reasonable price for loss of vision?
(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...
prisoner6
Also, look for the Fed/gov to claim that Mayos, Shriners hospitals, etc are now federal property, if this ‘’change you can live with’’ passes.
Obama offers nothing for the people he only takes from them.
It sounds to me like under Obamacare we’d get less care for more money. That’s neither cost-effective nor humane.
The only reason left for pushing it is to force tons of Socialism on America.
Whose money and whose vision? That's one of the insurmountable problems with socialized medicine.
Of course, the solution would be to simply pay for the additional treatments using your own money or supplemental insurance. Surely they wouldn't stop anyone from doing that.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.