Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canary in the Coal Mine (when Gold tells you the future)
Safe haven /Europacific Capital ^ | September 11, 2009 | Peter Schiff

Posted on 09/11/2009 4:53:49 PM PDT by sickoflibs

Like a battering ram in a medieval siege, gold keeps hammering away at the gate. For the third time in less than twelve months, the yellow metal is once again crashing into the $1,000 per ounce level. As of press time, it looks like gold will close above that level today and will set a new record in the process. Even if the breach is fleeting, who can doubt that it will mount another assault soon? In the meantime, there is no shortage of market analysts who are not buying gold while questioning the motives of those who are. Although they offer a variety of strained reasons, they nearly all agree that it has nothing to do with inflation, which is nearly universally considered dead and buried. As a self-confessed gold bug, I can assure all that inflation is the only reason I buy gold. And recently, I'm buying a lot.

When individuals choose to accumulate savings in the form of gold rather than interest-bearing paper deposits in government-insured accounts, there is only one reason for doing so: they fear that the interest will not be enough to compensate for their expected loss of purchasing power through inflation. This fear reflects both current inflation and the expectation for future inflation. While there are those who buy gold to speculate on its appreciation, the underlying factor that drives that appreciation in the first place will always be inflation. If governments were not creating inflation, there would be little investment advantage to owning gold.

Some believe that gold investors are primarily motivated by fear. It is often assumed that gold is the one asset class that holds its value when all other asset classes are falling due to market uncertainty. But this explanation brings us right back to inflation. When economies move into recession, there is always political pressure for governments to intervene. Their one tool is the printing press.

When governments act to prop up sagging markets, or bailout investors or depositors of failed institutions, they create inflation (print money) to pay for it. This, in effect, transfers capital from prudent investors to speculators. At the same time, it pulls the rug out from under the safest vehicles of traditional investment - bonds and cash. It becomes hard for investors to protect their principal, much less grow their wealth. Some turn to gold, with its historically guaranteed 'floor' against losses, and others start making ever riskier investments to try to 'beat' the inflation rate.

Gold's appeal as an asset of choice during times of political uncertainty, particularly during wartime, is again a function of its being a hedge against inflation. Wars are always expensive. They are also often unpopular, which makes paying for them through tax increases politically dangerous. As a result, they are almost always financed through the 'secret tax' of inflation. For a nation that loses a war, or suffers revolution or systemic civil conflict, there is always the chance that its currency could become worthless. While this may not be the kind of inflation that we read about in the business section, it is the ultimate form of the monetary malady - whereby a currency loses all of its purchasing power.

Whenever the price of gold rises sharply, I always take it as an early warning sign that inflation expectations are rising. If those expectations are not met, its price will fall. If the market is correct, gold will maintain its gains. And if the inflation continues to intensify, so too will gold's rise. Most analysts, however, simply look at the dubious CPI to determine the presence of inflation and inflation expectations. They perennially forget that prices are a lagging indicator and only a symptom of inflation, and may in fact not be rising at the moment when inflation kicks into high gear.

The anti-gold camp takes their greatest solace from the bond market, where things have been eerily quiet. They maintain that since bond yields have not risen much, inflation must not be a problem, and so the gold bugs are simply paranoid. The bond market, they tell us, is populated by 'vigilantes' who sound a bugle call at the first whiff of inflation. But this argument ignores the fact that central bankers themselves are the biggest bond buyers and are in effect 'vigilantes-in-chief.' Their outsized participation in the market has led to gross distortions. When the Fed or another central bank buys treasuries, real returns are not considered. Purchases are made for political reasons rather than investment merit, which renders meaningless the signals current bond prices are sending.

The gold-bashers also believe that reduced consumer demand due to unemployment will keep inflation pressures at bay for the foreseeable future. However, inflation will ultimately act to reduce the supply of goods much faster than unemployment reduces demand for goods, sending prices up despite lower demand. The stagflation of the 1970s is an example of such an outcome.

The bottom line is that gold is continuing its long-term bull run, and those who dismiss the message behind its rise do so at their own financial peril. When it comes to inflation, gold is the canary in the economic coal mine. Just as unseen toxins kill the canary before the miners succumb to the fumes, a spike in gold is a harbinger of reckless monetary devaluation. Our leading commentators think that since they can't see or smell the gas, all those canaries (gold prices, commodity prices) must be dying of natural causes. Good luck to them when the toxins flood the mine.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; gold; inflation; schiff; schifflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
The Peter Schiff/Redistribution Watch Ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!)

If you realize both parties in Washington think our money is theirs and you trust them to do the wrong thing, this list is for you.

If you think there is a Santa Claus who is going to get elected in Washington and cut a few taxes and spend a few trillion and jump start the economy, and get our lost money back, this list is not for you.

You can read past posts by clicking on : schifflist , I try to tag all relevant threads with the keyword : schifflist.

Ping list pinged by sickoflibs.

To join the ping list: FReepmail sickoflibs with the subject line add Schifflist.

(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop Schifflist.)

1 posted on 09/11/2009 4:53:50 PM PDT by sickoflibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

traded at $1010 at one point today I think. Maybe the highest price ever?


2 posted on 09/11/2009 4:56:31 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harrius Magnus; mojitojoe; Pelham; mom2twinsn2; LongLiveTheRepublic; ConservativeOrBust; ...
The Peter Schiff/Redistribution Watch Ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!)

"The gold-bashers also believe that reduced consumer demand due to unemployment will keep inflation pressures at bay for the foreseeable future. However, inflation will ultimately act to reduce the supply of goods much faster than unemployment reduces demand for goods, sending prices up despite lower demand. The stagflation of the 1970s is an example of such an outcome. "

3 posted on 09/11/2009 4:57:50 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Liz; Vendome; originalbuckeye; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Mr. Silverback; bcsco

Not a pretty future ping!


4 posted on 09/11/2009 5:02:35 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

Gold was $35/oz in the ‘30’s. Now touching $1000. Tell you anything???


5 posted on 09/11/2009 5:05:40 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

There was another article this week that the Chinese have been quietly buying gold for a while, trying to do it in small lots surreptitiously so they don’t panic the market and cause the price to rise.

They’re holding a lot of U.S. dollars and they know we are now just printing money with no collateral.


6 posted on 09/11/2009 5:08:34 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1993905/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Gold was $35 an ounce in the early 1970s. It went to around $800 an ounce in the early 80s and then interest rates were raised to 20% to get inflation (and the price of gold) under control.

http://goldismoney.info/forums/


7 posted on 09/11/2009 5:09:32 PM PDT by American Silver Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Gold was $35/oz in the ‘30's

American citizens also weren't allowed to buy gold on the open market, so of course the price was stable then.

8 posted on 09/11/2009 5:11:02 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1993905/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

Even worse, the Chinese have legalized and told their citiznes to start buying gold and silver. Buy (and take possession) while you still can.

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/09.09/bubble.html


9 posted on 09/11/2009 5:11:39 PM PDT by American Silver Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

And, the other side of that coin is that China has historically favored silver over gold as a value store.
High Ho Silver!


10 posted on 09/11/2009 5:12:06 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

You could by a gallon of gas for a quarter in the 50s. The value of that sane quarter (it’s a silver one, remember) will get you a gallon of gas now, too.


11 posted on 09/11/2009 5:17:25 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: American Silver Eagle

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/09.09/bubble.html

The China Card

As powerful as those forces are, they are not the main factors of the perfect storm and coming bubble. A force that threatens to profoundly disrupt the silver market is China. After 60 years of it being illegal for Chinese citizens to buy and hold silver (and gold), it has recently become legal. Not only that, the government is actively encouraging citizens to buy silver, allowing it to be sold by banks. Early reports suggest that the Chinese government is succeeding, with stories of bank lines developing for people waiting to buy silver. With the world’s largest population that has an established and ingrained propensity to save, and with an historically attractive asset suddenly available after a void of 60 years, it’s hard to imagine how a rush into silver won’t develop.

In addition, reports of pending export restrictions from China, the world’s largest refiner and third largest miner of silver, threaten to create a one-two price punch never witnessed before. Years ago I wrote, at the urging of my friend and mentor, Izzy Friedman, how China was likely the big silver short, depressing the price to pick up refining market share and dominance in the world production of silver. After the low price drove out world refining competition, China could then be in the position of controlling the price and driving it as high as they desired. I can’t help but think that not only was such analysis by Izzy correct, but it may be about to be realized.


12 posted on 09/11/2009 5:17:58 PM PDT by American Silver Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Buying @ $1000/oz. is quite a risk.

Remember: What goes up must come down.
Ask the Japanese, who bought a lot of overpriced American real estate/assets in the late 1980’s.


13 posted on 09/11/2009 5:36:11 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Wow, we agree on something. I wonder if (oh the horror!) we agree on anything else?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1907814/posts


14 posted on 09/11/2009 5:39:00 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
whether prices zoom up astronomically or the stockpile of goods decreases dramatically...it all means one thing....prices will be much higher IF one can find the goods to buy...

there's many reasons to stockpile essentials, one of them is that the price might skyrocket and the other reason is that there might not be any goods to skyrocket....

stockpile essentials......period....for whatever reason you choose...

15 posted on 09/11/2009 6:12:17 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

since I can’t afford gold, I ‘m glad we’ve got our silver bullion...


16 posted on 09/11/2009 6:13:52 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

No. If you adjust for inflation the price in 1980 was much higher.


17 posted on 09/11/2009 6:34:48 PM PDT by Pelham (Obammunism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Let me be the first to make this prediction:

BHO and Co. probably hate gold in the hands of citizens, as it points to their debauching the currency.

Therefore, before term 1 is over, the tax rate on profits in gold and silver sales will rise to the 70%-80% range. The resulting selloff will allow the govt. to purchase your metals at bargain prices.


18 posted on 09/11/2009 6:44:46 PM PDT by Phillipian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phillipian

Not if you and it are already in ....THAILAND?


19 posted on 09/11/2009 6:50:42 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
We should be friends and partners on things we agree on and continue to tweak each other on things we really disagree on. I personally think debate makes these threads more interesting, they certainly make yours more fun and long....

See if you like :

Fiat Money: How Else You Gonna Kill 600,000 Americans?

20 posted on 09/11/2009 7:53:00 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson