Skip to comments.
Obamacare Or Romneycare? ["If Obama is a socialist, why isn't Romney?"]
The Atlantic ^
| 2009-09-10
| Andrew Sullivan
Posted on 09/10/2009 10:37:24 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Ambers ponders the import of the popular universal health insurance policy in Massachusetts. The weirdest thing about the Republicans right now is that their most viable candidate next time backed almost exactly the healthcare reform Obama is proposing. If Obama is a socialist, why isn't Romney?
(Excerpt) Read more at andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bho2009; bho44; derangedromneybots; dnc4obama; dnc4romney; healthcare; liberalfascism; msm4romney; rino; rinos4obama; romney; romney4obama; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneybot4obama; romneybringsdeath; romneycare; romneydeathpanel; romneykillsgrandma; romneyservesdnc; romneytruthfile; socialists; stfu; working4obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj; ejonesie22; greyfoxx39; Diogenesis
*Ping!*
2
posted on
09/10/2009 10:37:48 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(So many Communists, so little time.)
To: rabscuttle385
3
posted on
09/10/2009 10:39:07 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: rabscuttle385
He is a socialist.. otherwise why would the people in Mass. elect him.. Romney has ten foot pole marks all over him..
4
posted on
09/10/2009 10:41:11 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: svcw
" Who says he isn’t? "
The MittBots say so.
To: rabscuttle385
He is a socialist.....and a joker. Go away Mitt, and stay away.
6
posted on
09/10/2009 10:44:25 PM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(Obamanos!)
To: rabscuttle385
Because Romney is a committed RINO, just looking for a better way (to out Obama Obama).
vaudine
7
posted on
09/10/2009 10:45:22 PM PDT
by
vaudine
To: rabscuttle385
"The weirdest thing about the Republicans right now is that
their most viable candidate next time backed almost exactly the healthcare reform Obama is proposing."
Sarah Palin ? I think not. I heard a Socialist scumbag loser who is the least viable candidate next time backs it. What's his name ? Slick Willard ?
8
posted on
09/10/2009 10:45:34 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: rabscuttle385
If 0bamycare is (equal to or greater than) Romney care....
...wouldn’t that make 0bamy a RINO?
9
posted on
09/10/2009 10:46:08 PM PDT
by
This_far
To: rabscuttle385
Anyone who supprts Willard is not a Conservative.
Just say no RINO’s
10
posted on
09/10/2009 10:46:54 PM PDT
by
AmericanSphinx71
(President 0bama or President Usama, is there really a difference?)
To: rabscuttle385
He is, and if he’s our most viable candidate, God help us...
11
posted on
09/10/2009 10:50:36 PM PDT
by
babygene
To: rabscuttle385
The GOP is going to look a lot different once we run charlatans like Slick Willard out on a rail.
The verbal assault we will make on this phony SOB next time he gets up to speak in front of CPAC will make the town hall meetings look tame.
12
posted on
09/10/2009 10:54:23 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: rabscuttle385
Prive Insurance vs Public Managed......Gee that’s a hard one to get huh?
13
posted on
09/10/2009 10:54:54 PM PDT
by
byteback
To: babygene
“
He is, and if he’s our most viable candidate,” He isn't. “Most viable candidate” circa 2007(according to the MSM), Rudy Giuliani says “Hello”
“God help us...”
He will. I am sure, even the ever loving God has about had enough of "The One", by now.
To: hosepipe
Are you saying he was touched- nicely or in a mean way.
To: rabscuttle385
Romney has absolutely zero impact on my life and is very unlikely to have any in the future.
I never understand these Romney threads.
Time is better spent focusing on Obama.
To: babygene
“He is, and if he’s our most viable candidate, God help us...”
It seems that a lot of folks seem threatened by him.
He hasn’t got a chance.
To: rabscuttle385
He is.
18
posted on
09/10/2009 11:03:00 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
To: rabscuttle385
Interesting isn’t it that Sullivan’s blog has no way for readers to post comments, not even moderated comments.
The willingness to accept and publish reader comments is the one thing that tempers the fundamental arrogance of blogging, and Sullivan (or The Atlantic) will have nothing of it. Typical of the State-Run Media, even when they adopt the form of a blog.
19
posted on
09/10/2009 11:05:42 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: incredulous joe
We have to first keep our own party clean from the leftist backstabbers doing the dirty work for the rodent opposition, hence why these threads are here: to remind folks about the enemy within, and to aggressively work to make sure they are NEVER allowed to hijack our party.
20
posted on
09/10/2009 11:08:18 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson