Posted on 09/10/2009 7:00:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
One of President Obama's biggest challenges this fall will be persuading seniors to accept his healthcare proposals. Many elderly voters are deeply worried about "Obama-care" because they fear that his plans will reduce their coverage and increase their costs. Seniors, in fact, are more opposed to Obama's healthcare ideas than any other age group.
This is ironic because those over 65 rely on the government in so many ways, such as through Medicare and Social Security. But they have developed a deep skepticism toward Obama's agenda of expanding the reach and power of Washington. They basically agree with the conservative attack that he is a liberal zealot who wants to inject the government into every nook and cranny of American life—including everyday decisions about the choice of doctors and medical plans, pollsters say. Some seniors specifically fear that the healthcare overhaul will take money away from their cherished Medicare program, and they don't want to take that risk.
Only 35 percent of people 65 and older approve of Obama's handling of healthcare, according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll in August, substantially lower than the 44 percent who approve of his handling of the issue among people 30 to 64 and the 57 percent among those 18 to 29. And only 8 percent of seniors say Obama's plans would improve their own healthcare, while 42 percent believe that Obama's plans would make it worse.
Seniors have other serious concerns about Obama. They are scared about the vast debt his administration is running up, and they don't like some of his "bailouts" of the car industry, big financial institutions, and people who took out risky mortgage loans, pollsters say.
And during the campaign, while Obama impressed many Americans with his youth and energy, he never quite reassured white seniors that he was one of them. As a result, he lost the over-65 white vote to Republican nominee John McCain by 45 to 53 percent. Many of these voters felt he was too young, too inexperienced, too liberal, and too wedded to change at any cost—and they weren't sure that, as an African-American, he would fairly represent white voters' interests.
All this could result in serious damage to Obama's agenda. Seniors vote in higher proportions than other voters, especially in off-year elections, so members of Congress carefully keep track of their political temperature. Many seniors also have the free time and motivation to pack political forums and multiply the decibel level of their voices. Look at the angry protesters at the town hall meetings of Democratic legislators this summer. TV coverage showed that the most furious and vocal demonstrators were often white seniors.
Obama strategists are well aware that seniors are frequently culturally conservative and that they represent the only major age group Obama lost in the last election, but the strategists haven't figured out a way to stop the hemorrhaging.
Meanwhile, the Republicans are trying to take full advantage. Michael Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee, addressed the issue last week when he said, "We need to protect Medicare and not cut it in the name of 'health insurance reform.' " A new RNC ad on TV urges "no cuts in Medicare to pay for a new program" as part of a "seniors' bill of rights."
The fury of the Democrats in response shows how dangerous they think this issue is for them. Not only did the Democratic National Committee attack the GOP effort as a "seniors' bill of lies," but DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse also said, "Republicans have substituted scare tactics for substance and lies for truth." Attempting to resurrect old stereotypes among the elderly about the GOP, Woodhouse added in a news release: "Now, the very Republicans who opposed the creation of Social Security and tried to dismantle it less than four years ago—and the same Republicans who have worked against Medicare since its inception—are now standing up for seniors? With all due respect to Michael Steele, that dog just won't hunt." Democrats say Steele was being hypocritical for attacking Obama's "public option," a government alternative to private insurance, while at the same time Steele was defending the big-government program of Medicare.
But Steele was reflecting the concerns of seniors and seemed to be playing smart politics. The more the GOP drives a wedge between Obama and the elderly, the less effective Obama will be and the more trouble the president and his fellow Democrats will face.
I’ve already seen the AARP commercial during the Steeler’s game. ‘Scare tactics’ and ‘myths’. Geez, wonder where they got THOSE talking points?
I have not seen this story before, but it does not surprise me. I think seniors are off the Obama reservation.
As for career groups, Bammie get the most support for freeloader ObamaCare from the eunuchs in the state run MSM.
don’t under estimate the power of ignorance our media pushes.
What should worry Obama and the Democrats even more is seniors are the one group that come out in DROVES during midterm elections.
Dont underestimate the seniors; their and understanding understanding of communism. MAny remember too well! The ones with sense will counsel their children....
Yes, and we have to step up the resistance to this farce. I don’t want Obamacare!
Yes, but dead people vote almost 100% democratic. Under Obamacare we'll have plenty more of those.
Obama is doing to himself and other Dems exactly what the Dems do to Republicans every election cycle. Making seniors afraid of them. When you scare the seniors you’re screwed. I so hope he and his pals are screwed with the seniors.
Baby Boomers need to WAKE up. They are just behind seniors. Baby Boomers will be facing that Govt (ACORN) union thug in a decade or so with the blue or red pill.
Obama is gonna screw baby boomers good. Seniors need to tell their dumb kids and grand kids to wake up.
I get the AARP newspaper. You would not believe the democrat party propaganda... which defies all reason on even the most minimal inspection.
YEP. Seniors tend to vote. Young people don’t.
I know of several seniors who were swayed TO him because of his ads that McCain would take away their healthcare... they are all having buyers remorse.
The YouTube links below are Part 1 and 2 of a tape made by a man and his wife from their ranch in south-central Texas . At their own expense, they made 1000 copies and sent one to every single congressman and senator and some media outlets. Let’s hope that each and every one of them watched and LISTENED!!!
Part 1 www.YouTube.com/watch?v=j7sQHunYdN8
Part 2 www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJsF11PsnQ
If you will check back, I believe that most of the “senior citizens” voted for obama and the democrat. They did it for three, actually four reasons:1. they believed obama when he promised them “free helth care”. 2. They believed obama when he promised them that under his presidency they would not have to pay income taxes. 3. They believed obama when he said that mc cain was going to cut 500 billlion dollars from medicare. 4. They believed the Democrats when they said that the Republicans were going to cut out social security.
In other words they believed a liar when he promised them paradise if they would only vote for him.
They wanted him, they got him, now let them sleep with him.
As much as I dispise obama, I dispise the fools that put him in power 100 times more.
Seniors can probably tip the scale in any election. If he, and dems, loose that voting block then it could spell trouble. Here is what I find interesting and scary: You know that they know how much trouble they are in at the next election, so, I think it is even more evidence that they don’t care. All Obama and the dems care about is passing as much of his radical agenda during this term as possible. I have said this for a while, and I believe it. They are going to put so much socialist agenda in place that will be next to impossible to unwind in the future.
I agree with everything you stated, but would add another item. We need candidates that are not afraid to be conservative. We cannot afford to put another ‘McCain’ type in front of the conservative electorate in the future if we ever expect to win again.
I see NO evidence, other than Sarah, that anyone is bubbling to the top of the conservative ticket. We need new blood at the top, and we need them SOON. It should be a top priority that we find a leader, get behind that person, and work like hell to get them elected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.