Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buyers of Huge Manhattan Complex Face Default Risk [$4.4 Billion Default?]
NYTimes ^ | September 09, 2009

Posted on 09/09/2009 9:56:32 AM PDT by Steelfish

Buyers of Huge Manhattan Complex Face Default Risk

CHARLES V. BAGLI September 9, 2009

Three years ago, the sale of the 110 red brick apartment buildings at Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village in Manhattan amounted to the biggest American real estate deal of all time.

Now the buyers are running out of time and money. Jerry and Rob Speyer and their partner, BlackRock Realty, who together paid $5.4 billion for the quiet middle-class redoubt near the East River, have nearly exhausted an additional $890 million set aside for apartment renovations, landscaping and interest payments. Rents are down 25 percent from their peak.

Real estate analysts say that the partnership’s money will run out as soon as December and that the owners are at “high risk” of default on $4.4 billion in loans. Two real estate executives who have been briefed on the finances insist that the owners can hold out, but only until February.

On Thursday, the partnership will go before the Court of Appeals in Albany to try to overturn a lower court decision that could force them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in rent rebates to thousands of tenants.

Regardless of the outcome at the Court of Appeals, Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village are in trouble.

City officials have been monitoring the looming crisis, worried that the financial problems could eventually lead to default, deferred maintenance and disinvestment at a complex that has served as an oasis of affordability in Manhattan for middle-class New Yorkers.

Some 6,875 of the 11,227 apartments at the two adjoining complexes are rent regulated.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/09/2009 9:56:33 AM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Some 6,875 of the 11,227 apartments at the two adjoining complexes are rent regulated.

Why anyone would pay $5.40 -- let alone $5.4 billion -- to operate under constraints like this is beyond me.

2 posted on 09/09/2009 10:00:30 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How can we still have rent stabilization in the city? No wonder the project is in the toilet. If it’s not completed there will be the South Bronx Syndrome’’ explotion all over again. then the whores will return with their pimps and drugs and shootings( all of the thugs will be white don’t cha know)


3 posted on 09/09/2009 10:02:25 AM PDT by shadeaud ("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

4 posted on 09/09/2009 10:02:53 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The buyers foolishly thought they’d slowly get out from under the various rent constraints. Only folks with no understanding of NY politics could have believed that.


5 posted on 09/09/2009 10:04:48 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

Gee, glad I don’t live in Stuy Town...wait a second...doh! The market-price rents are reasonable by Manhattan standards and would be lower if people weren’t clinging to their ridiculously low stabilized apartments. Once again the socialists are ruining a decent thing in their quest for Utopia.


6 posted on 09/09/2009 10:15:38 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

That’s why I find it odd that this company in particular would bungle a real estate deal like this. Tishman Speyer also owns Rockefeller Center, the Chrysler Building, the MetLife Building, and other prominent buildings all over New York City.


7 posted on 09/09/2009 10:17:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
President Ford got it right in 1975.


8 posted on 09/09/2009 10:19:10 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
President Ford got it right in 1975.

Unfortunately, Betty convinced Gerry that NYC was "too big to fail."

9 posted on 09/09/2009 10:20:58 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Maybe they needed a good tax write-off.


10 posted on 09/09/2009 10:21:21 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
City officials have been monitoring the looming crisis, worried that the financial problems could eventually lead to default, deferred maintenance and disinvestment at a complex that has served as an oasis of affordability in Manhattan for middle-class New Yorkers.

What is unsaid is the current "cold war" in both complexes between the aging retirees and the "spoiled" college students who('s parents) pay considerably more rent than the former. This has been detailed in the local press.

11 posted on 09/09/2009 10:22:21 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
RENT REGULATED!!

Any one who agrees with this crap ought to go bankrupt.

12 posted on 09/09/2009 10:24:38 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I heard plenty about that before I moved into Stuytown and now find the whole argument was blow way out of proportion. Stuytown is the nicest place to live in Manhattan IMO barring several million to blow. My gf lives across the street from a zillionaire movie star and even he doesn’t get to walk out his front door into a pleasant park. Tishman’s attempts to make the neighborhood “hip” with silly little glass study rooms and film festivals were misguided because nobody has time for that stuff. But I’m a fan of the place overall and would prefer that everyone pay a fair market price as opposed to subsidizing some grannies who think they’re entitle to live in 1971.


13 posted on 09/09/2009 10:37:48 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I am guessing they hoped to flip it out to a greater fool, but were themselves that fool.


14 posted on 09/09/2009 10:46:24 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson