Posted on 09/08/2009 1:20:40 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
Bacteria are the oldest living things on earth, and researchers have long felt that they must lead dull, unfussy lives. New discoveries are starting to show just how wrong that notion is.
For a simple, single-cell creature, a bacterium is surprisingly social. It can communicate in two languages. It can tell self from nonself, friend from foe. It thrives in the company of others. It spies on neighbors, spreads misinformation and even commits fratricide.
"Really, they're just stripped-down versions of us," says Bonnie Bassler, microbial geneticist at Princeton University, who has spent two decades peeking at the inner lives of bacteria. Dr. Bassler and other scientists are using this information to devise new ways to fight infections and reduce antibiotic resistance.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Cool, germ psy-ops.
Ping
Just wait until we get some nut starting the “People for the Ethical Treatment of Bacteria” demanding an end to all destruction of said life form.
As a mindset and worldview, I find that a dangerous concept.
There are allegedly ten times as many cells of bacteria in a typical human, than there are cells of human.
I couldn’t find any remark of the kind in this article.
So here’s a thought.
There is probably some huge microscope outside our universe. Someone is peering through it right now and commenting how these seemingly multi-cellular things seem to communicate while thriving on an electron with this bright nucleus. They seem to be able to move around on their own power and have created this unique environment that sustains their lives.
And even that being is trying to figure out who voted for Obama!
Actually, HiTech is right. One source is on page 90 of “Darwin’s Ghost” by Steve Jones, where Jones writes ...
“Just a tenth of the cells in our bodies are human. Most of the rest belong to bacteria (although a few fungi, mites, and worms leaven the mix).”
On page 284, Jones also writes: “About a thousand genes are shared by every organism, however simple or compicated. Although their common ancestor must have lived more than a billion years ago, their shared structure can still be glimpsed. It shows how the grand plan of life has been modified through the course of evolution.”
I had learned before about some good symbiosis our bodies have with bacteria - as in digestion.
Until this article, I had not read or considered just how pervasive living bacteria were to our bodies.
Thanks for the post.
So just imagine what a human fertilized egg is and can do.
[[”Really, we’re no better than bacteria”.]]
Sorry- but we ARE better than bacteria- Bacteria do not ‘choose’ based on logic- they ‘react’ based on predesigned instructions already coded in- quorum-sensing is simply a predesigned ‘trigger mechanism’, interrupt their quorum-sensing, and the info designed into hte bacteria fail to trigger
[[Equally remarkable is how bacteria band together and behave like sophisticated, multicellular animals. They sometimes organize into deeply structured “slime cities,” or biofilms.]]
Ah yes- projecting beyond hte evidnece- Golly- Bacteria doign what they were designed to do- whoda thunk it?
[[It thrives in the company of others. It spies on neighbors, spreads misinformation and even commits fratricide.]]
They make htis statement, then don’t give any examples?- And htis would- had they given examples, just go to show again, that they are predesigned to ‘give misinformaiton’ when triggered to do so- not that they are ‘thinking and hcoosing’ to do so like humans do- even the bacteria that only give off bioluminescent light only when a ‘certain number are present together’ again shows nothign but a system of predesign and trigger reactions
[[[[”Really, we’re no better than bacteria”.]]]]
BS!
[[About a thousand genes are shared by every organism, however simple or compicated. Although their common ancestor must have lived more than a billion years ago, their shared structure can still be glimpsed. It shows how the grand plan of life has been modified through the course of evolution.]]
Throw out an unprovable ASSUMPTION without ANY evidence ot back it up- then claim it that hte ASSUMPTION proves evolution- (And for good measure- just ignore informaiton theory which is devestating to the hypothesis of Macroevolution- just wave it away- along with hte second law, mathematical impossibilities, chemical impossibilities, biological impossibilities,, and also be sure to convince everyone that thigns that are irreducibly complex only ‘look irreducibly complex, and that nature is pulling a grand trick on us) This is ‘science;’?
I think beliefs belong in church.
A more accurate tagline might read:
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
[[Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.]]
Precisely- which is WHY they shopuld NOT allow the RELIGOUS beleif in macroevolution in schools and keep it in the temple of Darwin where it belongs
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.