Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voinovich fiery in opposing Ohio slots proposal (Ohio Nanny State Alert!)
Forbes.com ^ | 09-04-09 | JULIE CARR SMYTH

Posted on 09/04/2009 7:35:52 AM PDT by GOP_Lady

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- U.S. Sen. George Voinovich used biblical verse Thursday to blast gambling proponents, including Ohio Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland, who is an ordained minister.

Voinovich, the former Republican governor, joined forces with the Ohio Roundtable and Methodist churches to announce a lawsuit they filed Thursday at the Ohio Supreme Court against Strickland's plan to place slots-like video lottery terminals at Ohio racetracks.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: gambling; ohio; slots; voinovich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: xzins

You do realize that most of the casinos in Vegas are run by only a few individuals/corporations, don’t you?


41 posted on 09/05/2009 7:57:25 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I can appreciate that, my fellow Ohioan. :-)


42 posted on 09/05/2009 7:59:06 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Sheesh! Another pol pissing and moaning ‘cuz he did’nt get “his” cut....


43 posted on 09/05/2009 8:00:03 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo
And who gets caught up in the middle? The people.

Let me repeat, Voinoivich and the Ohio Roundtable do not want ANY type of gambling in this state.

That's quite alright by me, because I get free rooms and meals in Vegas. Stuff it, you stuffy people.

44 posted on 09/05/2009 8:02:05 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

It doesn’t matter that other states aren’t honest enough to simply make gambling legal.

There is no reason Ohio should follow their lead.

I’ll not vote for any law that grants special gambling privilege to others.

Personally, I don’t see any reason for states to be controlling gambling in the first place. Seems like if I feel like playing poker at Uncle Joe’s Bar & Grill, then it really isn’t anyone else’s business.


45 posted on 09/05/2009 8:06:17 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

I didn’t vote for the smoking law either. In fact, I’ll not vote for any ridiculous changes to the state constitution that involve thousands and thousands of added words. Do you remember the election with 5 of 6 constitutional changes each involved thousands of words.

I didn’t vote for any of them.

I don’t give a fig how much Las Vegas makes at gambling since if it involves the by law enriching of a limited number of people or cities.

It is simple to propose a fair law. It should say simply:

“Gambling shall be legal in the State of Ohio”

Now, if you don’t belive in nanny states, then you’ll support those simple 9 words above. If you do believe in nanny states then you’ll support the nanny telling us which 4 or 5 citizens out of millions that it’s going to let run gambling.

Nanny, isn’t just telling us what to eat, it’s telling it who we have to go to to get the food.

“Gambling shall be legal in the State of Ohio”


46 posted on 09/05/2009 8:21:50 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’m with you 100%!!!

If only the simplest solutions would ever be possible. :-)


47 posted on 09/05/2009 8:30:07 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It’s time for US AND OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS to get spines.


48 posted on 09/05/2009 8:31:35 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

So anything that constitutes “temptation” should be banned by law? So much for liberty, huh?


49 posted on 09/06/2009 5:59:43 PM PDT by E Rocc (I Pledge: To help the President get promoted to "private citizen" as soon as possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson