Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health Care Bill Gives Obama Power to Appoint Government 'Commissioner' With Sweeping Power ...
cnsnews.com ^ | 9/3/09 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 09/03/2009 3:00:14 PM PDT by Nachum

(CNSNews.com) – The health care bill under consideration in the House of Representatives would give President Obama the authority to name a new federal “Health Choices Commissioner” who would have sweeping power to govern the health insurance plans offered in a so-called "exchange" where millions of Americans would get their health insurance if the bill is enacted.

These powers would include deciding which treatments are covered, which companies can participate, which states can run their own exchange, and enrolling individuals into the public exchange.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bhoczars; bhohealthcare; bill; care; commissioner; health
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2009 3:00:14 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 09/03/2009 3:00:41 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Repeated acts that would not be upheld as Constitutional, but not a single Republican lawmaker standing up and forcing the issues to court.


3 posted on 09/03/2009 3:02:46 PM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Of course it does. The Health Care Reform bill (HCR) is about power not health care and not insurance.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I oppose Health Care Reform (HCR) because it is a direct assault on individual liberties. I think that is its main purpose.

HCR is not just about rationing and wealth redistribution. It's about the end of all individual rights as the corrosive effects of the new collectivist basic human right to health care spreads throughout the legal and political system like a virus.

Congressman Anthony Weiner says that health care is not a commodity. If health care is not a commodity then doctors and nurses are not free and sovereign citizens. If health care is a right then health care workers are slaves to that right who must serve it. No health care worker could refuse to provide their services, for any reason, because that would violate the patient's basic human right to health care.

That means that health care providers have no individual rights. The collective right of the people to receive health care would supersede the provider's individual right to set their fees, their hours or change their occupational status or even decide how to apply their skills and knowledge. A collective right, by practical definition, is a state right because it is a right that is provided by the government to all not protected by the government as something possessed by each person. It is also a state right because it supersedes the individual rights of others when the two come into conflict.

It isn't stated in any of the bills that a patient's rights to care supersedes a provider's right to set fees and hours etc, but it doesn't need to. Rights are always adjudicated in the courts. The legislation simply establishes the foundation for the courts to rule in favor of the patient's collective right to health care.

Weiner’s view is collectivist, fascist and totalitarian. Collectivist because it is superior to an individual right. Fascist because it is overseen by one entity the Federal government. Totalitarian because the Federal government is the true possessor of this collective right and the administrator and enforcer of it as well.

Congressman Weiner's view is the underlying philosophy of the entire Health Care Reform legislation the House and Senate have put forth. Consider the setting up of community watch dogs to monitor various health parameters of citizens in the Senate version of the bill. Look at pages 382 - 393.

TITLE I—QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AMERICANS

Even the citizens themselves will be subject to state set regulations on their behavior in order to fulfill the human right of universal health care. It isn't the individual's liberty that is being protected by that it is the state's control over its health care system that is being guarded. How much clearer can it be that these bills abrogate the concept of individual rights?

Health Care is a Liberty Issue Conservative Underground - 18 August 2009 - Tim Dunkin

Second Bill of Rights aka FDR's economic bill of rights (An early attempt to embed collective rights into American politics and society.)

Another Stupid Argument: Heath Care is a Right

Involuntary Medical Servitude

4 posted on 09/03/2009 3:06:34 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

If Republicans started seriously complaining about the Constitutionality of the legislation that Democrats propose then they would have to start defending the Constitutionality of the legislation that they propose. Ain’t gonna happen.


5 posted on 09/03/2009 3:09:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Democrats can’t do anything right.


6 posted on 09/03/2009 3:12:01 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Gestapo to aid the Czars destroying our country and stealing our freedom.


7 posted on 09/03/2009 3:16:10 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29; TigersEye
When demorats swear to “support and defend the Constitution,” they lie.

When pubbies swear to “support and defend the Constitution,” they don't mean it.

8 posted on 09/03/2009 3:20:07 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Oh I see. Now they are called “Commissioners”. What happened to “Czars”?


9 posted on 09/03/2009 3:20:51 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Where are the watchdogs who should speak up when the Constitution is violated? Where is the Justice department? Just sitting back picking their noses?


10 posted on 09/03/2009 3:25:09 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

Again with the the F-ing Czars!

I D.O. N.O.T. W.A.N.T. A.N.Y. F.-I.N.G. P.L.A.N.!!!!

That’s great! Another A-hole who has sweeping powers to make whatever changes he feels like.

FUBO!


11 posted on 09/03/2009 3:27:04 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

“Repeated acts that would not be upheld as Constitutional, but not a single Republican lawmaker standing up and forcing the issues to court.”

This is what I don’t understand. Why are no lawmakers on our side being more forceful about the unconstitutionality of practically everything Obama has been doing since he was elected? Why aren’t more of them shouting from the rooftops about all of the marxists that Obama has surrounded himself with? Why aren’t more of them demanding to see rock solid proof of his friggin eligibility to even be president?

WTH is going on in Washington?


12 posted on 09/03/2009 3:27:27 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
Where is the Justice department? Just sitting back picking their noses?

No, they're busy going after the CIA.

13 posted on 09/03/2009 3:27:57 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Sarah Palin: Americas last, best hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Thanks! I was looking for a new excuse.

I didn’t lie, really! I just didn’t mean it.


14 posted on 09/03/2009 3:27:59 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just say “NOOOOOOOOOO”.


15 posted on 09/03/2009 3:28:17 PM PDT by maeng ( b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Oh yes they can!

They do voter fruad, community organizing, lies, race baiting, propaganda, undermining Americas freedom and many other activities very very well.


16 posted on 09/03/2009 3:29:03 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
Here's the problem: The Constitution says the President has a certain group of officials, ie the Cabinet, confirmed by the Senate. Obama has a "cabinet" in place, or mostly in place. That fulfills the Constitutional provision. There is no prohibition on his hiring a number of other advisors--and no way to insure he uses the Cabinet as intended as opposed to his gang of thugs in the White House basement.

Every president has had his coterie of trusted advisors. It is just that as a true Alinsky subversive, Obama is taking an accepted procedure, twisting and perverting it beyond recognition, and using it against the very purpose for which it was intended (loyal governance).

17 posted on 09/03/2009 3:37:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Problem is, we have little idea about the people who put an “R” next to their name and run for office. Seriously, who the hell are these people? None of us really knows their background for the most part, they just appear on the scene and are suddenly candidates. We need a clean sweep in Washington, everyone of them out. EVERY ONE.


18 posted on 09/03/2009 3:42:23 PM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

I agree, but there are a few good ones that are worth keeping on our side...but not many.


19 posted on 09/03/2009 3:56:33 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The White House is now floating the idea of passing health care reform with a so-called “trigger,” as proposed by Sen. Olympia Snowe. Could progressives support a plan like that?


20 posted on 09/03/2009 3:56:58 PM PDT by Americaneedsyoou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson