Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

So you are saying that it is better to have NO baby than to take a CHANCE that something may be wrong with the baby. Handicapped children are a blessing to parents and SIBLINGS who value life. You don’t sound as though you do. Responsible doesn’t mean preventing pregnancy. Responsible mean taking responsibility for the lives you procreate. The Duggars do that. And yes the Bible is clear that God controls the womb. He opens and shuts it. The fruit of the womb is His reward.


189 posted on 09/02/2009 10:25:29 AM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

Notice the worldly anti-family viewpoint that has infected people, even supposedly Christian people.


192 posted on 09/02/2009 10:26:59 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

I’m saying they were irresponsible IMO to risk more children at an older age when things can go horribly wrong ESPECIALLY when they already have a boat load of children and that is all.
Plus if they are not lucky to have good health in the next birth, their choices could make the other siblings have to take on the results of their parent’s choices after they die later. Potentially very selfish, whether for themselves, in the name of God and so forth.
Kind of like parents leaving their children the national debt they caused. I see an ethical problem with that.

Maybe they don’t know how to use birth control?
I hope the baby is born healthy.
Good day.


199 posted on 09/02/2009 10:38:30 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson