Posted on 09/01/2009 4:16:27 AM PDT by IbJensen
We are enjoined not to speak ill of the dead. But, when an entire nation – or, at any rate, its “mainstream” media culture – declines to speak the truth about the dead, we are certainly entitled to speak ill of such false eulogists.
In its coverage of Senator Edward M Kennedy’s passing, America’s TV networks are creepily reminiscent of those plays Sam Shepard used to write about some dysfunctional inbred hardscrabble Appalachian household where there’s a baby buried in the backyard but everyone agreed years ago never to mention it.
In this case, the unmentionable corpse is Mary Jo Kopechne, 1940-1969. If you have to bring up the, ah, circumstances of that year of decease, keep it general, keep it vague. As Kennedy flack Ted Sorensen put it in Time magazine:
“Both a plane crash in Massachusetts in 1964 and the ugly automobile accident on Chappaquiddick Island in 1969 almost cost him his life…”
That’s the way to do it! An “accident”, “ugly” in some unspecified way, just happened to happen – and only to him, nobody else. Ted’s the star, and there’s no room to namecheck the bit players. What befell him was …a thing, a place. As Joan Vennochi wrote in The Boston Globe:
“Like all figures in history - and like those in the Bible, for that matter - Kennedy came with flaws. Moses had a temper. Peter betrayed Jesus. Kennedy had Chappaquiddick, a moment of tremendous moral collapse.”
Actually, Peter denied Jesus, rather than “betrayed” him, but close enough for Catholic-lite Massachusetts. And if Moses having a temper never led him to leave some gal at the bottom of the Red Sea, well, let’s face it, he doesn’t have Ted’s tremendous legislative legacy, does he? Perhaps it’s kinder simply to airbrush out of the record the name of the unfortunate complicating factor on the receiving end of that moment of “tremendous moral collapse”. When Kennedy cheerleaders do get around to mentioning her, it’s usually to add insult to fatal injury. As Teddy’s biographer Adam Clymer wrote, Edward Kennedy’s “achievements as a senator have towered over his time, changing the lives of far more Americans than remember the name Mary Jo Kopechne.”
You can’t make an omelette without breaking chicks, right? I don’t know how many lives the Senator changed - he certainly changed Mary Jo’s - but you’re struck less by the precise arithmetic than by the basic equation: How many changed lives justify leaving a human being struggling for breath for up to five hours pressed up against the window in a small, shrinking air pocket in Teddy’s Oldsmobile? If the Senator had managed to change the lives of even more Americans, would it have been okay to leave a couple more broads down there? Hey, why not? At the Huffington Post, Melissa Lafsky mused on what Mary Jo “would have thought about arguably being a catalyst for the most successful Senate career in history… Who knows – maybe she’d feel it was worth it.” What true-believing liberal lass wouldn’t be honored to be dispatched by that death panel?
We are all flawed, and most of us are weak, and in hellish moments, at a split-second’s notice, confronting the choice that will define us ever after, many of us will fail the test. Perhaps Mary Jo could have been saved; perhaps she would have died anyway. What is true is that Edward Kennedy made her death a certainty. When a man (if you’ll forgive the expression) confronts the truth of what he has done, what does honor require? Six years before Chappaquiddick, in the wake of Britain’s comparatively very minor “Profumo scandal”, the eponymous John Profumo, Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for War, resigned from the House of Commons and the Queen’s Privy Council, and disappeared amid the tenements of the East End to do good works washing dishes and helping with children’s playgroups, in anonymity, for the last 40 years of his life. With the exception of one newspaper article to mark the centenary of his charitable mission, he never uttered another word in public again.
Ted Kennedy went a different route. He got kitted out with a neck brace and went on TV and announced the invention of the “Kennedy curse”, a concept that yoked him to his murdered brothers as a fellow victim – and not, as Mary Jo perhaps realized in those final hours, the perpetrator. He dared us to call his bluff, and, when we didn’t, he made all of us complicit in what he’d done. We are all prey to human frailty, but few of us get to inflict ours on an entire nation.
His defenders would argue that he redeemed himself with his “progressive” agenda, up to and including health care “reform”. It was an odd kind of “redemption”: In a cooing paean to the Senator on a cringe-makingly obsequious edition of NPR’s Diane Rehm Show, Edward Klein of Newsweek fondly recalled that one of Ted’s “favorite topics of humor was, indeed, Chappaquiddick itself. He would ask people, ‘Have you heard any new jokes about Chappaquiddick?’”
Terrific! Who was that lady I saw you with last night?
Beats me!
Why did the Last Lion [CORRECT] cross the road?
To sleep it off!
What do you call 200 Kennedy sycophants at the bottom of a Chappaquiddick pond? A great start, but bad news for NPR guest-bookers! “He was a guy’s guy,” chortled Edward Klein. Which is one way of putting it.
When a man is capable of what Ted Kennedy did that night in 1969 and in the weeks afterwards, what else is he capable of? An NPR listener said the Senator’s passing marked “the end of civility in the US Congress”. Yes, indeed. Who among us does not mourn the lost “civility” of the 1987 Supreme Court hearings? Considering the nomination of Judge Bork, Ted Kennedy rose on the Senate floor and announced that “Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit down at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution…”
Whoa! “Liberals” (in the debased contemporary American sense of the term) would have reason to find Borkian jurisprudence uncongenial but to suggest the judge and former Solicitor-General favored re-segregation of lunch counters is a slander not merely vile but so preposterous that, like his explanation for Chappaquiddick, only a Kennedy could get away with it. If you had an identify a single speech that marked “the end of civility” in American politics, that’s a shoo-in.
If a towering giant cares so much about humanity in general, why get hung up on his carelessness with humans in particular? For Kennedy’s comrades, the cost was worth it. For the rest of us, it was a high price to pay. And, for Ted himself, who knows? He buried three brothers, and as many nephews, and, as the years took their toll, it looked sometimes as if the only Kennedy son to grow old had had to grow old for all of them. Did he truly believe, as surely as Melissa Lafsky and co, that his indispensability to the republic trumped all else? That Camelot – that “fleeting wisp of glory”, that “one brief shining moment” - must run forever, even if “How To Handle A Woman” gets dropped from the score. The Senator’s actions in the hours and days after emerging from that pond tell us something ugly about Kennedy the man. That he got away with it tells us something ugly about American public life.
Ugly isn't the word for this. More like murder, or manslaughter 1 when a miserable scum swims away to safety deliberately leaving a young woman to die! This singular act is the measure of Ted Kennedy, a wealthy socialist rat who spent the rest of his life in an attempt to ruin his country.
Apparently he promised satan his soul if his miserable life could be extracted from this dilemma. Now this corpulent imbecile will discover what eternity means.
Your sentiments are similar to mine. On Saturday I said to my wife, he is probably looking UP right now saying, “all this for me?”
Moses was in the wilderness for 40 years, and doing the math, it is just now 40 years since Mary Jo was killed by Kennedy’s self serving escape in 1969. Had Kennedy been in the wilderness for 40 years, the “lyin’ of the Senate” would have passes without any fanfare.
Steyn is an excellent writer
Burn in Hell, Ted.
God bless you, Mary Jo.
Steyn is indeed an excellent writer. What a pleasure to read his work. This article is dead on, and Steyn should be commended for not holding back.
If given a chance how many more lives of Americans could Charlie Manson have changed than remember the name of Sharon Tate?
Aaah, Teddy’s biographer, Adam Clymer.
The original clymer.
People also don’t examine the plane crash closely enough. Kennedy was drunk off his ass and trying to get to another political function in Boston. The pilot said the weather was too bad to fly. Kennedy insisted that they go, the pilot finally backed down and the pilot and Ted’s assistant died in the weather-related crash. So that’s two more deaths the scumbag was responsible for.
All you need to know about Harvard is that they let Teddy back in.
He dared us to call his bluff, and, when we didn’t, he made all of us complicit in what he’d done. We are all prey to human frailty, but few of us get to inflict ours on an entire nation.
We could also insert into this quote the current situation in our top government position for another perfect fit.
God is the great judge and Uncle Teddy aint worried about who fills his Senate seat.
For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing;they have no futher reward... go, eat your food with gladness, and drink your wine with a joyful heart... whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might..(ecclesiastes 9:5-10)
How will Ted know?
...”That he got away with it tells us something ugly about American public life.”
Wrong, Mark. It tells us something ugly about liberal American public life, not American public life in general. I refuse to bear any responsibility for “looking the other way” on this issue.
I believe Ted Kennedy was an abysmal human being, as were too many of his extended family. He was given a free pass by a criminally complicit media, of the same ilk that foisted the equally fraudulent Barack Obama on America.
There is no end to the hypocrisy and double-speak that come from today’s democrat party and leftist liberals. They are, as a group, simultaneously shameful and shameless.
That whole family is accursed, Old Joe made a deal with the Devil. They will get their reward.
The two events—colluding with the enemy and allowing Mary Jo to drown—are what define the man. How the left can all but declare him a saint (if not the Second Coming) with these facts out in the open is beyond me. While it might be unkind to speak ill of the dead, it’s utterly obscene to glorify this horrid man’s life.
And Orrin Hatch is unaware of all this???
“Aaah, Teddy’s biographer, Adam Clymer.
The original clymer.”
I picked up on that, too. Very fitting that the “Clymer” would be the murderer’s biographer.
Indeed. Only a clymer could write about a clymer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.