Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate trouble may be bubbling up in far north (methane from the permafrost and seabed)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/30/09 | Charles J. Hanley - ap

Posted on 08/30/2009 5:46:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

MACKENZIE RIVER DELTA, Northwest Territories – Only a squawk from a sandhill crane broke the Arctic silence — and a low gurgle of bubbles, a watery whisper of trouble repeated in countless spots around the polar world.

"On a calm day, you can see 20 or more `seeps' out across this lake," said Canadian researcher Rob Bowen, sidling his small rubber boat up beside one of them. A tossed match would have set it ablaze.

"It's essentially pure methane."

Pure methane, gas bubbling up from underwater vents, escaping into northern skies, adds to the global-warming gases accumulating in the atmosphere. And pure methane escaping in the massive amounts known to be locked in the Arctic permafrost and seabed would spell a climate catastrophe.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bubbles; climate; hydrates; methane; permafrost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: NormsRevenge
"If we lost just 1 percent of the carbon in permafrost today, we'd be close to a year's contributions from industrial sources," he said. "I don't think policymakers have woken up to this. It's not in their risk assessments."

An interesting statement, because he seems to be admitting that the 'contribution' by humans to the greenhouses gases in the atmostphere is miniscule, compared to natural sources. And just what the heck are the 'policymakers' supposed to do about those natural sources?

21 posted on 08/30/2009 7:19:13 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Forget about that—stick a pipe in it and sell it...didn’t even have to drill for it —woo hoo!


22 posted on 08/30/2009 7:20:03 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And still - we are here - how can it be? How can it be?


23 posted on 08/30/2009 7:21:34 PM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : "Envy" gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Drill to relieve the pressure causing the leaks. Then pipe it south to heat my house in the winter. If it’s going to escape anyway, why waste it?

Humanity dies from freezing to death. A liberal dem says to God, why didn’t you save us? God says I didn’t think you believed in me. The guy says he does now. God says I put a bunch of oil and gas under the land and you didn’t drill. And I put it under the seas and you didn’t drill. I made it leak out into the ocean so you could sea the bubbles and still you didn’t get the message. And so, you froze to death.

(A variation of the story of the guy who drowned in a flood.)


24 posted on 08/30/2009 7:22:19 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra
I may be wrong here but I thought methane easily and quickly dispersed in the atmosphere.

Correct! Methane is lighter than air (mostly Nitrogen, some Oxygen) and will rise quickly. It will also disperse quickly and reach a dilution level below flammability limits (it won't burn).

25 posted on 08/30/2009 7:29:53 PM PDT by SpeedRacer (Where's your records, B-HO? What are you hiding?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Prior to 2007 exploration of the tundra along the Arctic line was an activity reserved for the brief summer months only — due to the difficulty of land travel and the consensus understanding that it was far too cold to measure significant emissions when the hard freeze set back in; also coincident with the loss of the majority of the reporting stations after the fall of the USSR, satellite sensors came on line that allowed year-round remote observations of a number of geophysical phenomena among which was emissions of natural methane.

Rather than a general admission of surprise of heretofore unexpected levels of winter emissions when the new results were analyzed, the spin doctors went into hyperdrive and declared that global warming has passed a tipping point where none had before ever been recorded to where now this revelation was an ominous indication of how fast it had become and how short the redemption period was becoming; truly, the end is near.

Saner voices are suggesting that the permafrost was never permanent in the sense that it somehow remained (remains?) impermeable but it merely poses an impediment to another in a long line of journeys in search of the truth.

Somewhere along the way, the tongue of truth seems to have gotten caught up in the tread of the trudging juggernaut of climate change and we can’t seem to understand a word we hear.


26 posted on 08/30/2009 8:08:46 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Since its mole weight is nearly the same as air itself it immediately goes into flux except in areas of entrainment; yet it is a GHG gas with a GHG potential of +40XCO2 which — ‘amplifies’ it.


27 posted on 08/30/2009 8:12:18 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Methane oxidizes in the atmosphere even when dilute—it has a half-life that correlates to temperature and light. It doesn’t hang around long.


28 posted on 08/30/2009 8:18:35 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Poincare

My last post got all messed up as it got mixed up with CO somehow.


29 posted on 08/30/2009 8:20:38 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Nicely said.


30 posted on 08/30/2009 9:53:38 PM PDT by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Shady

Tough.


31 posted on 08/31/2009 3:02:40 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RC2

In the works, no doubt.


32 posted on 08/31/2009 3:03:23 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Since its mole weight is nearly the same as air itself it immediately goes into flux except in areas of entrainment; yet it is a GHG gas with a GHG potential of +40XCO2 which — ‘amplifies’ it.

Thanks for the reply but I have no idea what you said.

33 posted on 08/31/2009 4:58:22 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

MacKensie river delta may be a great place to drill for natural gas. That way we can use it to fuel our power plants.


34 posted on 08/31/2009 11:55:26 AM PDT by Mogollon (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson